GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
rustsec-2026-0277
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-08-26 12:00
Modified
2026-09-02 08:56
Summary
Path traversal in apimock-server's file-serving fallback
Details

The file-serving fallback joined a request-derived path onto the configured response directory and checked only that the result existed, never that it stayed inside that directory. A request containing a raw .. segment could read any file readable by the process, returned with HTTP 200.

Read-only: no write, no code execution.

Exposure depends on the bind address. The default is 127.0.0.1; deployments binding 0.0.0.0 or a LAN address are reachable from the network. Most HTTP clients normalise .. away before sending, so reaching it requires a client that does not.

All published versions before 5.19.1 are affected. Fixed in 5.19.1 by canonicalising each resolved path and rejecting anything outside its base directory.

This advisory also covers apimock 5.x, which depends on apimock-server. apimock 4.x predates the crate split and carries its own advisory for the same issue, fixed in 4.8.1.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "file-disclosure"
        ],
        "cvss": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "apimock-server",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/apimock-server"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "5.19.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "GHSA-72g6-wgrg-vhm7"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "The file-serving fallback joined a request-derived path onto the\nconfigured response directory and checked only that the result existed,\nnever that it stayed inside that directory. A request containing a raw\n`..` segment could read any file readable by the process, returned with\nHTTP 200.\n\nRead-only: no write, no code execution.\n\nExposure depends on the bind address. The default is `127.0.0.1`;\ndeployments binding `0.0.0.0` or a LAN address are reachable from the\nnetwork. Most HTTP clients normalise `..` away before sending, so\nreaching it requires a client that does not.\n\nAll published versions before 5.19.1 are affected. Fixed in 5.19.1 by\ncanonicalising each resolved path and rejecting anything outside its\nbase directory.\n\n**This advisory also covers `apimock` 5.x**, which depends on\n`apimock-server`. `apimock` 4.x predates the crate split and carries its\nown advisory for the same issue, fixed in 4.8.1.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0277",
  "modified": "2026-09-02T08:56:54Z",
  "published": "2026-08-26T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/apimock-server"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0277.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/apimokka/apimock-rs/commit/ff0dd152ecfccb3bf00e15cc92bd4d57e485c854"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Path traversal in apimock-server\u0027s file-serving fallback"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…