GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
rustsec-2026-0272
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2026-08-27 12:00
Modified
2026-08-31 09:44
Summary
Panic-safety unsoundness in `Stack::pop`, `Fifo::pop_front` and `Value::replace_stable` (use-after-free / double-free)
Details

Three removal and replacement paths destroy an initialized value before committing the metadata change that removes it. Destruction runs T::drop(), which is user code and may panic. If it does, the commit is skipped and the container still claims ownership of the already-destroyed value, so its own destructor drops that value a second time.

Stack::pop drops the top value before reducing next_ofs. Stack's destructor pops in a loop, so an unchanged next_ofs re-drops the same value.

Fifo::pop_front (via pop_front_inner) drops the front value before advancing read_pos. An unchanged read_pos still points at the destroyed value.

Value::replace_stable drops the existing value before writing the replacement. If the destructor panics the replacement is never written, but the backing storage still holds the old value's metadata.

This is separate from RUSTSEC-2021-0033, which covered a clone panic on insertion in push_cloned and was fixed in 0.6.1.

Impact

A heap-owning value is freed twice, corrupting the allocator. Reachable from safe Rust with any element type whose Drop can panic — no unsafe on the caller's side.

  • CWE-415 (Double Free)
  • CWE-416 (Use-After-Free)

Confirmed under AddressSanitizer, which reports attempting double-free on all three paths.

Fix

Fixed in 0.8.2.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "memory-corruption"
        ],
        "cvss": null,
        "informational": "unsound"
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [
            "stack_dst::Fifo::pop_front",
            "stack_dst::Stack::pop",
            "stack_dst::Value::replace_stable"
          ],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "stack_dst",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/stack_dst"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.8.2"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "Three removal and replacement paths destroy an initialized value before\ncommitting the metadata change that removes it. Destruction runs `T::drop()`,\nwhich is user code and may panic. If it does, the commit is skipped and the\ncontainer still claims ownership of the already-destroyed value, so its own\ndestructor drops that value a second time.\n\n`Stack::pop` drops the top value before reducing `next_ofs`. `Stack`\u0027s\ndestructor pops in a loop, so an unchanged `next_ofs` re-drops the same value.\n\n`Fifo::pop_front` (via `pop_front_inner`) drops the front value before advancing\n`read_pos`. An unchanged `read_pos` still points at the destroyed value.\n\n`Value::replace_stable` drops the existing value before writing the replacement.\nIf the destructor panics the replacement is never written, but the backing\nstorage still holds the old value\u0027s metadata.\n\nThis is separate from RUSTSEC-2021-0033, which covered a clone panic on\ninsertion in `push_cloned` and was fixed in 0.6.1.\n\n## Impact\n\nA heap-owning value is freed twice, corrupting the allocator. Reachable from\nsafe Rust with any element type whose `Drop` can panic \u2014 no `unsafe` on the\ncaller\u0027s side.\n\n* CWE-415 (Double Free)\n* CWE-416 (Use-After-Free)\n\nConfirmed under AddressSanitizer, which reports `attempting double-free` on all\nthree paths.\n\n## Fix\n\nFixed in 0.8.2.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2026-0272",
  "modified": "2026-08-31T09:44:04Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/stack_dst"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0272.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://github.com/thepowersgang/stack_dst-rs/issues/16"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Panic-safety unsoundness in `Stack::pop`, `Fifo::pop_front` and `Value::replace_stable` (use-after-free / double-free)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…