GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration
rustsec-2021-0063
Vulnerability from osv_rustsec
Published
2021-05-04 12:00
Modified
2023-06-13 13:10
Summary
XSS in `comrak`
Details

comrak operates by default in a "safe" mode of operation where unsafe content, such as arbitrary raw HTML or URLs with non-standard schemes, are not permitted in the output. This is per the reference GFM implementation, cmark-gfm.

Ampersands were not being correctly escaped in link targets, making it possible to fashion unsafe URLs using schemes like data: or javascript: by entering them as HTML entities, e.g. data:. The intended behaviour, demonstrated upstream, is that these should be escaped and therefore harmless, but this behaviour was broken in comrak.


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "categories": [
          "format-injection"
        ],
        "cvss": null,
        "informational": null
      },
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "affected_functions": null,
        "affects": {
          "arch": [],
          "functions": [],
          "os": []
        }
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "comrak",
        "purl": "pkg:cargo/comrak"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.0.0-0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.10.1"
            }
          ],
          "type": "SEMVER"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-38186",
    "GHSA-6wj2-g87r-pm62"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "license": "CC0-1.0"
  },
  "details": "[comrak](https://github.com/kivikakk/comrak) operates by default in a \"safe\"\nmode of operation where unsafe content, such as arbitrary raw HTML or URLs with\nnon-standard schemes, are not permitted in the output.  This is per the\nreference GFM implementation, [cmark-gfm](https://github.com/github/cmark).\n\nAmpersands were not being correctly escaped in link targets, making it possible\nto fashion unsafe URLs using schemes like `data:` or `javascript:` by entering\nthem as HTML entities, e.g. `\u0026#x64\u0026#x61\u0026#x74\u0026#x61\u0026#x3a`.  The intended\nbehaviour, demonstrated upstream, is that these should be escaped and therefore\nharmless, but this behaviour was broken in comrak.",
  "id": "RUSTSEC-2021-0063",
  "modified": "2023-06-13T13:10:24Z",
  "published": "2021-05-04T12:00:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/comrak"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2021-0063.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/kivikakk/comrak/releases/tag/0.10.1"
    }
  ],
  "related": [],
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "XSS in `comrak`"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…