GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

PYSEC-2026-2871

Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-13 15:15 - Updated: 2026-07-13 16:05
VLAI
Details

Local file inclusion (LFI) and server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in pgAdmin 4 LLM API configuration endpoints.

User-supplied api_key_file and api_url preferences were passed to the LLM provider clients without validation. An authenticated user could read arbitrary server-side files by pointing api_key_file at any path readable by the pgAdmin process, or coerce pgAdmin into making requests to internal targets (e.g. cloud metadata services such as 169.254.169.254) by setting api_url, exploiting the chat path and model-list endpoints.

Fix restricts api_key_file to the user's private storage (server mode) or home directory (desktop mode), enforces a printable-ASCII key shape and a 1024-byte read cap, and gates api_url against a configurable allow-list (config.ALLOWED_LLM_API_URLS) at every entry point.

This issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.15.

Impacted products
Name purl
pgadmin4 pkg:pypi/pgadmin4

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "PyPI",
        "name": "pgadmin4",
        "purl": "pkg:pypi/pgadmin4"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "9.15"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "4.20",
        "4.22",
        "4.23",
        "4.24",
        "4.25",
        "4.26",
        "4.27",
        "4.28",
        "4.29",
        "4.30",
        "5.0",
        "5.1",
        "5.2",
        "5.3",
        "5.4",
        "5.5",
        "5.6",
        "5.7",
        "6.10",
        "6.11",
        "6.12",
        "6.13",
        "6.14",
        "6.15",
        "6.16",
        "6.17",
        "6.18",
        "6.19",
        "6.2",
        "6.20",
        "6.21",
        "6.3",
        "6.4",
        "6.5",
        "6.6",
        "6.7",
        "6.8",
        "6.9",
        "7.0",
        "7.1",
        "7.2",
        "7.3",
        "7.4",
        "7.5",
        "7.6",
        "7.7",
        "7.8",
        "8.0",
        "8.1",
        "8.10",
        "8.11",
        "8.12",
        "8.13",
        "8.14",
        "8.2",
        "8.3",
        "8.4",
        "8.5",
        "8.6",
        "8.7",
        "8.8",
        "8.9",
        "9.0",
        "9.1",
        "9.10",
        "9.11",
        "9.12",
        "9.13",
        "9.14",
        "9.2",
        "9.3",
        "9.4",
        "9.5",
        "9.6",
        "9.7",
        "9.8",
        "9.9"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-7817",
    "GHSA-p58c-q354-6c4f"
  ],
  "details": "Local file inclusion (LFI) and server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in pgAdmin 4 LLM API configuration endpoints.\n\nUser-supplied api_key_file and api_url preferences were passed to the LLM provider clients without validation. An authenticated user could read arbitrary server-side files by pointing api_key_file at any path readable by the pgAdmin process, or coerce pgAdmin into making requests to internal targets (e.g. cloud metadata services such as 169.254.169.254) by setting api_url, exploiting the chat path and model-list endpoints.\n\nFix restricts api_key_file to the user\u0027s private storage (server mode) or home directory (desktop mode), enforces a printable-ASCII key shape and a 1024-byte read cap, and gates api_url against a configurable allow-list (config.ALLOWED_LLM_API_URLS) at every entry point.\n\nThis issue affects pgAdmin 4: before 9.15.",
  "id": "PYSEC-2026-2871",
  "modified": "2026-07-13T16:05:30.286328Z",
  "published": "2026-07-13T15:15:44.937259Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7817"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/issues/9900"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4/commit/24485fe96"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/pgadmin-org/pgadmin4"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://pypi.org/project/pgadmin4"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-p58c-q354-6c4f"
    }
  ],
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "pgAdmin 4 contains local file inclusion (LFI) and server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…