PYSEC-2026-2740
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-13 15:46 - Updated: 2026-07-13 16:05Summary
There is a blind server side request forgery in the functionality that allows editing an image via a prompt. The affected function will perform a GET request on the URL provided by the user. There is no restriction on the domain of the provided URL allowing the local address space to be interacted with. Since the SSRF is blind (the response cannot be read) impact is port scanning of the local network because it can be confirmed if the port is open based on if the GET request failed.
Details
The vulnerability occurs here:
https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/2b26355002064228e9b671339f8f3fb9d1fafa73/backend/open_webui/routers/images.py#L850-L916
Line 911 shows the user provided URL passed to the function load_url_image. Within this function on line 883 HTTP/HTTPs URLs are trusted blindly and called asynchronously with requests.get.
PoC
The vulnerability can be reproduced with the following curl command:
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/images/edit \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <token>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"form_data":{
"image": "<url>",
"prompt": "poc"}
}'
Impact
Response differentials can be used to port scan the local network:
This can be automated to iterate through the entire port range to determine open ports. If the service running on an open port can be inferred the user may be able to interact with it in a meaningful way if the service offers any state changing GET request endpoints.
Remediation
Restrict provided URLs from local address space.
| Name | purl | open-webui | pkg:pypi/open-webui |
|---|
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "open-webui",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/open-webui"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "0.7.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.1.124",
"0.1.125",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.2.2",
"0.2.3",
"0.2.4",
"0.2.5",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1",
"0.3.10",
"0.3.12",
"0.3.13",
"0.3.14",
"0.3.15",
"0.3.16",
"0.3.17",
"0.3.17.dev2",
"0.3.17.dev3",
"0.3.17.dev4",
"0.3.17.dev5",
"0.3.18",
"0.3.19",
"0.3.2",
"0.3.20",
"0.3.21",
"0.3.22",
"0.3.23",
"0.3.24",
"0.3.25",
"0.3.26",
"0.3.27",
"0.3.27.dev1",
"0.3.27.dev2",
"0.3.27.dev3",
"0.3.28",
"0.3.29",
"0.3.3",
"0.3.30",
"0.3.30.dev1",
"0.3.30.dev2",
"0.3.31",
"0.3.31.dev1",
"0.3.32",
"0.3.33",
"0.3.33.dev1",
"0.3.34",
"0.3.35",
"0.3.4",
"0.3.5",
"0.3.6",
"0.3.7",
"0.3.8",
"0.3.9",
"0.4.0",
"0.4.0.dev1",
"0.4.0.dev2",
"0.4.1",
"0.4.2",
"0.4.3",
"0.4.4",
"0.4.5",
"0.4.6",
"0.4.6.dev1",
"0.4.7",
"0.4.8",
"0.5.0",
"0.5.0.dev1",
"0.5.0.dev2",
"0.5.1",
"0.5.10",
"0.5.11",
"0.5.12",
"0.5.13",
"0.5.14",
"0.5.15",
"0.5.16",
"0.5.17",
"0.5.18",
"0.5.19",
"0.5.2",
"0.5.20",
"0.5.3",
"0.5.3.dev1",
"0.5.4",
"0.5.5",
"0.5.6",
"0.5.7",
"0.5.8",
"0.5.9",
"0.6.0",
"0.6.1",
"0.6.10",
"0.6.11",
"0.6.12",
"0.6.13",
"0.6.14",
"0.6.15",
"0.6.16",
"0.6.18",
"0.6.19",
"0.6.2",
"0.6.20",
"0.6.21",
"0.6.22",
"0.6.23",
"0.6.24",
"0.6.25",
"0.6.26",
"0.6.26.dev1",
"0.6.27",
"0.6.28",
"0.6.29",
"0.6.3",
"0.6.30",
"0.6.31",
"0.6.32",
"0.6.33",
"0.6.34",
"0.6.35",
"0.6.36",
"0.6.37",
"0.6.38",
"0.6.39",
"0.6.4",
"0.6.40",
"0.6.41",
"0.6.42",
"0.6.43",
"0.6.5",
"0.6.6",
"0.6.6.dev1",
"0.6.7",
"0.6.8",
"0.6.9",
"0.7.0",
"0.7.1",
"0.7.2"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-34225",
"GHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv"
],
"details": "### Summary\nThere is a blind server side request forgery in the functionality that allows editing an image via a prompt. The affected function will perform a GET request on the URL provided by the user. There is no restriction on the domain of the provided URL allowing the local address space to be interacted with. Since the SSRF is blind (the response cannot be read) impact is port scanning of the local network because it can be confirmed if the port is open based on if the GET request failed.\n\n### Details\nThe vulnerability occurs here:\nhttps://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/blob/2b26355002064228e9b671339f8f3fb9d1fafa73/backend/open_webui/routers/images.py#L850-L916\nLine 911 shows the user provided URL passed to the function `load_url_image`. Within this function on line 883 HTTP/HTTPs URLs are trusted blindly and called asynchronously with `requests.get`. \n\n### PoC\nThe vulnerability can be reproduced with the following curl command:\n```\ncurl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/v1/images/edit \\\n -H \"Authorization: Bearer \u003ctoken\u003e\" \\\n -H \"Content-Type: application/json\" \\\n -d \u0027{\"form_data\":{\n \"image\": \"\u003curl\u003e\",\n \"prompt\": \"poc\"}\n }\u0027\n```\n\n### Impact\nResponse differentials can be used to port scan the local network:\n\u003cimg width=\"3016\" height=\"736\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/93b4df52-b23c-4ed7-a5fa-9cbedb30091c\" /\u003e\nThis can be automated to iterate through the entire port range to determine open ports. If the service running on an open port can be inferred the user may be able to interact with it in a meaningful way if the service offers any state changing GET request endpoints.\n\n### Remediation\nRestrict provided URLs from local address space.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-2740",
"modified": "2026-07-13T16:05:13.616624Z",
"published": "2026-07-13T15:46:29.423078Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/security/advisories/GHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34225"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/open-webui"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jgx9-jr5x-mvpv"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Open WebUI has Blind Server Side Request Forgery in its Image Edit Functionality"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.