PYSEC-2026-1921
Vulnerability from pysec - Published: 2026-07-07 16:02 - Updated: 2026-07-07 17:25
VLAI
Details
When verifying signatures with X509 certificate validation turned off and HMAC shared secret set (signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(require_x509=False, hmac_key=...), prior versions of SignXML are vulnerable to a potential algorithm confusion attack. Unless the user explicitly limits the expected signature algorithms using the signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(expect_config=...) setting, an attacker may supply a signature unexpectedly signed with a key other than the provided HMAC key, using a different (asymmetric key) signature algorithm.
Starting with signxml 4.0.4, specifying hmac_key causes the set of accepted signature algorithms to be restricted to HMAC only, if not already restricted by the user.
Severity
Impacted products
| Name | purl | signxml | pkg:pypi/signxml |
|---|
Aliases
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "signxml",
"purl": "pkg:pypi/signxml"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "4.0.4"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"versions": [
"0.0.1",
"0.1.0",
"0.1.1",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.3",
"0.1.4",
"0.1.5",
"0.1.6",
"0.1.7",
"0.1.8",
"0.1.9",
"0.2.0",
"0.2.1",
"0.2.2",
"0.2.3",
"0.2.4",
"0.2.5",
"0.2.6",
"0.2.7",
"0.2.8",
"0.2.9",
"0.3.0",
"0.3.1",
"0.3.2",
"0.3.3",
"0.3.4",
"0.3.5",
"0.3.6",
"0.3.7",
"0.3.8",
"0.3.9",
"0.4.0",
"0.4.1",
"0.4.2",
"0.4.3",
"0.4.4",
"0.4.5",
"0.4.6",
"0.5.0",
"0.6.0",
"1.0.0",
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"2.0.0",
"2.1.4",
"2.10.0",
"2.10.1",
"2.2.0",
"2.2.1",
"2.2.2",
"2.2.3",
"2.2.4",
"2.2.6",
"2.3.0",
"2.4.0",
"2.5.2",
"2.6.0",
"2.7.0",
"2.7.1",
"2.7.2",
"2.7.3",
"2.8.0",
"2.8.1",
"2.8.2",
"2.9.0",
"3.0.0",
"3.0.1",
"3.0.2",
"3.1.0",
"3.1.1",
"3.2.0",
"3.2.1",
"3.2.2",
"4.0.0",
"4.0.1",
"4.0.2",
"4.0.3"
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-48994",
"GHSA-6vx8-pcwv-xhf4"
],
"details": "When verifying signatures with X509 certificate validation turned off and HMAC shared secret set (`signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(require_x509=False, hmac_key=...`), prior versions of SignXML are vulnerable to a potential algorithm confusion attack. Unless the user explicitly limits the expected signature algorithms using the `signxml.XMLVerifier.verify(expect_config=...)` setting, an attacker may supply a signature unexpectedly signed with a key other than the provided HMAC key, using a different (asymmetric key) signature algorithm.\n\nStarting with signxml 4.0.4, specifying `hmac_key` causes the set of accepted signature algorithms to be restricted to HMAC only, if not already restricted by the user.",
"id": "PYSEC-2026-1921",
"modified": "2026-07-07T17:25:23.925481Z",
"published": "2026-07-07T16:02:53.867049Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml/security/advisories/GHSA-6vx8-pcwv-xhf4"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-48994"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml/commit/e3c0c2b82a3329a65d917830657649c98b8c7600"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/XML-Security/signxml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://pypi.org/project/signxml"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6vx8-pcwv-xhf4"
}
],
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "SignXML\u0027s signature verification with HMAC is vulnerable to an algorithm confusion attack"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…