pysec-2024-174
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2024-07-17 09:15
Modified
2025-01-18 22:21
Details

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache StreamPipes during installation process of pipeline elements. Previously, StreamPipes allowed users to configure custom endpoints from which to install additional pipeline elements. These endpoints were not properly validated, allowing an attacker to get StreamPipes to send an HTTP GET request to an arbitrary address. This issue affects Apache StreamPipes: through 0.93.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.95.0, which fixes the issue.

Impacted products
Name purl
streampipes pkg:pypi/streampipes
Aliases



{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "PyPI",
            name: "streampipes",
            purl: "pkg:pypi/streampipes",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "0.95.0",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
         versions: [
            "0.0.2.dev0",
            "0.91.0",
            "0.92.0",
            "0.93.0",
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-31979",
   ],
   details: "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Apache StreamPipes during installation process of pipeline elements.\nPreviously, StreamPipes allowed users to configure custom endpoints from which to install additional pipeline elements. \nThese endpoints were not properly validated, allowing an attacker to get StreamPipes to send an HTTP GET request to an arbitrary address.\nThis issue affects Apache StreamPipes: through 0.93.0.\n\nUsers are recommended to upgrade to version 0.95.0, which fixes the issue.\n\n",
   id: "PYSEC-2024-174",
   modified: "2025-01-18T22:21:43.678475+00:00",
   published: "2024-07-17T09:15:02+00:00",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/8lryp3bxnby9kmk13odkz2jbfdjfvf0y",
      },
      {
         type: "ARTICLE",
         url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread/8lryp3bxnby9kmk13odkz2jbfdjfvf0y",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/16/11",
      },
   ],
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.