pysec-2015-42
Vulnerability from pysec
Published
2015-11-17 15:59
Modified
2024-12-05 09:35
Details
providers/saml2/admin.py in the Identity Provider (IdP) server in Ipsilon 0.1.0 before 1.0.2 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1 does not properly check permissions, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service by deleting a SAML2 Service Provider (SP).
Impacted products
Name | purl |
---|---|
ipsilon | pkg:pypi/ipsilon |
Aliases
{ affected: [ { package: { ecosystem: "PyPI", name: "ipsilon", purl: "pkg:pypi/ipsilon", }, ranges: [ { events: [ { introduced: "0", }, ], type: "ECOSYSTEM", }, ], versions: [ "1.2.0", "3.0.0", "3.0.1", "3.0.2", "3.0.3", "3.0.4", "3.1.0", ], }, ], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-5301", ], details: "providers/saml2/admin.py in the Identity Provider (IdP) server in Ipsilon 0.1.0 before 1.0.2 and 1.1.x before 1.1.1 does not properly check permissions, which allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service by deleting a SAML2 Service Provider (SP).", id: "PYSEC-2015-42", modified: "2024-12-05T09:35:27.751929Z", published: "2015-11-17T15:59:00Z", references: [ { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/10/27/8", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://pagure.io/ipsilon/9dec97c3c83928d231ea10f4160523a13803e594", }, { type: "REPORT", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271530", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://fedorahosted.org/ipsilon/wiki/Releases/v1.0.2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://fedorahosted.org/ipsilon/wiki/Releases/v1.1.1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171076.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171067.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-November/171052.html", }, ], withdrawn: "2024-11-22T04:37:04Z", }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.