osv-2021-1687
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-12-14 00:00
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Segv on unknown address in cs_adjust_counts_icc
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=42290

Crash type: Segv on unknown address
Crash state:
cs_adjust_counts_icc
gstate_clone_core
gs_gsave

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": null
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "ghostscript"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "6a4847cd2566e8446753fd0ba17fe2f42c6e0315"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "31e249d5cbd561d76dd2149ceee5fe3a2d84d658"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "git://git.ghostscript.com/ghostpdl.git",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=42290\n\n```\nCrash type: Segv on unknown address\nCrash state:\ncs_adjust_counts_icc\ngstate_clone_core\ngs_gsave\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2021-1687",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:34.740613Z",
  "published": "2021-12-14T00:00:46.859448Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=42290"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Segv on unknown address in cs_adjust_counts_icc"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…