osv-2018-195
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-01-13 00:01
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in gmp_emsa_pkcs1_signature_data
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=10671

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow WRITE 1
Crash state:
gmp_emsa_pkcs1_signature_data
verify_emsa_pkcs1_signature
verify

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "HIGH"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "strongswan"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "5955db5b124a1ee5f44c0845b6e00c86fddae67c"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "129ab919a8c3abfc17bea776f0774e0ccf33ca09"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan.git",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": [
        "5.7.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=10671\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow WRITE 1\nCrash state:\ngmp_emsa_pkcs1_signature_data\nverify_emsa_pkcs1_signature\nverify\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2018-195",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:34.061437Z",
  "published": "2021-01-13T00:01:21.218732Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=10671"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in gmp_emsa_pkcs1_signature_data"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…