osv-2017-154
Vulnerability from osv_ossfuzz
Published
2021-01-15 00:01
Modified
2022-04-13 03:04
Summary
Heap-buffer-overflow in TetrahedralInterpFloat
Details

OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=852

Crash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 4
Crash state:
TetrahedralInterpFloat
_LUTeval16
CachedXFORM
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "ecosystem_specific": {
        "severity": "MEDIUM"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "OSS-Fuzz",
        "name": "lcms"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "46a9220375da02b179bb6c0314b5cef40a433792"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "76d1dccf3e5ce0c67125964d0908b322e7d1afb9"
            }
          ],
          "repo": "https://github.com/mm2/Little-CMS.git",
          "type": "GIT"
        }
      ],
      "versions": []
    }
  ],
  "details": "OSS-Fuzz report: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=852\n\n```\nCrash type: Heap-buffer-overflow READ 4\nCrash state:\nTetrahedralInterpFloat\n_LUTeval16\nCachedXFORM\n```\n",
  "id": "OSV-2017-154",
  "modified": "2022-04-13T03:04:33.907967Z",
  "published": "2021-01-15T00:01:25.369737Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "REPORT",
      "url": "https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=852"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Heap-buffer-overflow in TetrahedralInterpFloat"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.