mal-2026-2862
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
Published
2026-04-19 10:44
Modified
2026-04-25 08:26
Summary
Malicious code in rtms-manager (npm)
Details

-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-

Source: amazon-inspector (c18da37bf0615d0c7dceb6be7eb89956f39de56bbc90f65d9398fbfb3f9455dc)

The package rtms-manager was found to contain malicious code.

Source: ossf-package-analysis (d50c578dddb4a0cd216dd21c4432a54846daef2a4c41bd80aef2ca6a983dacd5)

The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'rtms-manager' @ 1.2.0 (npm) as malicious.

It is considered malicious because:

  • The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.

  • The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.

Credits
Amazon Inspector actran@amazon.com
OpenSSF: Package Analysis github.com/ossf/package-analysis openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis
To clipboard 

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "npm",
        "name": "rtms-manager"
      },
      "versions": [
        "1.2.0",
        "1.4.0"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "credits": [
    {
      "contact": [
        "actran@amazon.com"
      ],
      "name": "Amazon Inspector",
      "type": "FINDER"
    },
    {
      "contact": [
        "https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
        "https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
      ],
      "name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
      "type": "FINDER"
    }
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "malicious-packages-origins": [
      {
        "import_time": "2026-04-19T10:47:16.309333262Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-04-19T10:44:08Z",
        "sha256": "d50c578dddb4a0cd216dd21c4432a54846daef2a4c41bd80aef2ca6a983dacd5",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "1.2.0"
        ]
      },
      {
        "import_time": "2026-04-23T20:49:06.026785687Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-04-23T20:43:56Z",
        "sha256": "c18da37bf0615d0c7dceb6be7eb89956f39de56bbc90f65d9398fbfb3f9455dc",
        "source": "amazon-inspector",
        "versions": [
          "1.2.0"
        ]
      },
      {
        "import_time": "2026-04-25T08:24:56.828922048Z",
        "modified_time": "2026-04-25T08:00:52Z",
        "sha256": "ba81d4885b3bbde680dc475922b0b6baf7bc02d50432d9addc5278b3b4d4efce",
        "source": "ossf-package-analysis",
        "versions": [
          "1.4.0"
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: amazon-inspector (c18da37bf0615d0c7dceb6be7eb89956f39de56bbc90f65d9398fbfb3f9455dc)\nThe package rtms-manager was found to contain malicious code.\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (d50c578dddb4a0cd216dd21c4432a54846daef2a4c41bd80aef2ca6a983dacd5)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027rtms-manager\u0027 @ 1.2.0 (npm) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.\n\n- The package executes one or more commands associated with malicious behavior.\n",
  "id": "MAL-2026-2862",
  "modified": "2026-04-25T08:26:42Z",
  "published": "2026-04-19T10:44:08Z",
  "schema_version": "1.7.4",
  "summary": "Malicious code in rtms-manager (npm)"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.