mal-2024-10473
Vulnerability from ossf_malicious_packages
-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-
Source: kam193 (ce38f402ec2ebebcc95e82007ff5807caab91173d1823fe9aa89db982083701e)
Packages showing simple variants of revshell with targets to ngrok. Most probably experiments. Later versions moved to use Burp Collaborator to exfiltrate simple data. Pentest? An artifact from some red team curse?
Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.
Campaign: 2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell
Reasons (based on the campaign):
-
The package contains code to create a reverse shell, allowing an attacker to execute any commands on the victim's machine.
-
The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.
-
The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.
Source: ossf-package-analysis (11b1345d2836c38bfe88ff677f6137f804e68acf077cdcbaef0003aa0f84355a)
The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e' @ 1.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.
It is considered malicious because:
- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e"
},
"versions": [
"1.0.1",
"1.0.4",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.1"
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/kam193",
"https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/"
],
"name": "Kamil Ma\u0144kowski (kam193)",
"type": "ANALYST"
},
{
"contact": [
"https://github.com/ossf/package-analysis",
"https://openssf.slack.com/channels/package_analysis"
],
"name": "OpenSSF: Package Analysis",
"type": "FINDER"
}
],
"database_specific": {
"malicious-packages-origins": [
{
"import_time": "2024-11-07T16:06:10.965876659Z",
"modified_time": "2024-11-07T15:43:55Z",
"sha256": "11b1345d2836c38bfe88ff677f6137f804e68acf077cdcbaef0003aa0f84355a",
"source": "ossf-package-analysis",
"versions": [
"1.0.1"
]
},
{
"import_time": "2024-11-07T16:38:32.286412736Z",
"modified_time": "2024-11-07T16:18:18Z",
"sha256": "3ede1b74e4bd77062eb0126b272a3516d648aa847b03a73da29270112781d8e1",
"source": "ossf-package-analysis",
"versions": [
"1.0.4"
]
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell/artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T22:30:54.912238601Z",
"modified_time": "2024-08-10T23:05:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "82068dab0487a25fe1b69c6ba0cce93c50ea7a6113ffd1578ab1bc3698e1c138",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell/artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e",
"import_time": "2025-12-02T23:07:17.95362196Z",
"modified_time": "2024-08-10T23:05:21Z",
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
],
"sha256": "ce38f402ec2ebebcc95e82007ff5807caab91173d1823fe9aa89db982083701e",
"source": "kam193"
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell/artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e",
"import_time": "2025-12-10T21:38:57.256501194Z",
"modified_time": "2024-08-10T23:05:21Z",
"sha256": "665e4772b7db1193b8a29979dd58dabfcb409476ca6f80c5b909c63a35804419",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.0.4",
"0.1.2",
"0.1.1"
]
},
{
"id": "pypi/2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell/artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e",
"import_time": "2025-12-30T22:39:04.031459626Z",
"modified_time": "2024-08-10T23:05:21Z",
"sha256": "567b678046b9551db4025d96a22cabc76a3b611624852bdcb05d4caaa8051f5d",
"source": "kam193",
"versions": [
"0.1.1",
"0.1.2",
"1.0.1",
"1.0.2",
"1.0.3",
"1.0.4"
]
}
]
},
"details": "\n---\n_-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_\n\n## Source: kam193 (ce38f402ec2ebebcc95e82007ff5807caab91173d1823fe9aa89db982083701e)\nPackages showing simple variants of revshell with targets to ngrok. Most probably experiments. Later versions moved to use Burp Collaborator to exfiltrate simple data. Pentest? An artifact from some red team curse?\n\n\n---\n\nCategory: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers.\n\n\nCampaign: 2024-08-lab-artifacts-revshell\n\n\nReasons (based on the campaign):\n\n\n - The package contains code to create a reverse shell, allowing an attacker to execute any commands on the victim\u0027s machine.\n\n\n - The package contains code to exfiltrate basic data from the system, like IP or username. It has a limited risk.\n\n\n - The package overrides the install command in setup.py to execute malicious code during installation.\n\n## Source: ossf-package-analysis (11b1345d2836c38bfe88ff677f6137f804e68acf077cdcbaef0003aa0f84355a)\nThe OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified \u0027artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e\u0027 @ 1.0.1 (pypi) as malicious.\n\nIt is considered malicious because:\n\n- The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.\n",
"id": "MAL-2024-10473",
"modified": "2025-12-31T02:45:15Z",
"published": "2024-08-10T23:05:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bad-packages.kam193.eu/pypi/package/artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.7.4",
"summary": "Malicious code in artifact-lab-3-package-02f73e0e (PyPI)"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.