jvndb-2025-001562
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2025-02-18 16:24
Modified
2025-02-18 16:24
Severity ?
Summary
Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in OMRON CX-Programmer
Details
CX-Programmer provided by OMRON Corporation contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability (CWE-125, CVE-2025-0591).
Michael Heinzl reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.
References
▼ | Type | URL |
---|---|---|
JVN | https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU92320053/ | |
CVE | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0591 | |
Out-of-bounds Read(CWE-125) | https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html |
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
OMRON Corporation | CX-One |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-001562.html", "dc:date": "2025-02-18T16:24+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2025-02-18T16:24+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2025-02-18T16:24+09:00", "description": "CX-Programmer provided by OMRON Corporation contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability (CWE-125, CVE-2025-0591).\r\n\r\nMichael Heinzl reported this vulnerability to JPCERT/CC.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2025/JVNDB-2025-001562.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:omron:cx-one", "@product": "CX-One", "@vendor": "OMRON Corporation", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "7.8", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "@version": "3.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2025-001562", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU92320053/", "@id": "JVNVU#92320053", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-0591", "@id": "CVE-2025-0591", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/125.html", "@id": "CWE-125", "@title": "Out-of-bounds Read(CWE-125)" } ], "title": "Out-of-bounds read vulnerability in OMRON CX-Programmer" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.