jvndb-2022-000021
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2022-03-16 14:46
Modified
2022-03-16 14:46
Severity ?
Summary
Multiple vulnerabilities in KINGSOFT "WPS Office" and "KINGSOFT Internet Security"
Details
"WPS Office" and "KINGSOFT Internet Security" provided by KINGSOFT JAPAN, INC. contain multiple vulnerabilities listed below.
* Stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) - CVE-2022-25949
* Insecurely loading Dynamic Link Libraries (CWE-427) - CVE-2022-26081, CVE-2022-25969, CVE-2022-26511
These vulnerabilities are reported by the following reporters, and
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
CVE-2022-26949: Satoshi Tanda
CVE-2022-26081, CVE-2022-26511: Eiji James Yoshida of Security Professionals Network Inc.
CVE-2022-25969: Tomohisa Hasegawa
References
Impacted products
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2022/JVNDB-2022-000021.html", "dc:date": "2022-03-16T14:46+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2022-03-16T14:46+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2022-03-16T14:46+09:00", "description": "\"WPS Office\" and \"KINGSOFT Internet Security\" provided by KINGSOFT JAPAN, INC. contain multiple vulnerabilities listed below.\r\n * Stack-based buffer overflow (CWE-121) - CVE-2022-25949\r\n * Insecurely loading Dynamic Link Libraries (CWE-427) - CVE-2022-26081, CVE-2022-25969, CVE-2022-26511\r\n\r\nThese vulnerabilities are reported by the following reporters, and\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.\r\n\r\nCVE-2022-26949: Satoshi Tanda\r\nCVE-2022-26081, CVE-2022-26511: Eiji James Yoshida of Security Professionals Network Inc.\r\nCVE-2022-25969: Tomohisa Hasegawa", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2022/JVNDB-2022-000021.html", "sec:cpe": [ { "#text": "cpe:/a:kingsoft:installer_of_kingsoft_wps_office", "@product": "Installer of WPS Office", "@vendor": "KINGSOFT, INC.", "@version": "2.2" }, { "#text": "cpe:/a:kingsoft:internet_security_9_plus", "@product": "KINGSOFT Internet Security 9 Plus", "@vendor": "KINGSOFT, INC.", "@version": "2.2" }, { "#text": "cpe:/a:kingsoft:wps_presentation", "@product": "WPS Presentation", "@vendor": "KINGSOFT, INC.", "@version": "2.2" } ], "sec:cvss": [ { "@score": "6.8", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C", "@version": "2.0" }, { "@score": "8.8", "@severity": "High", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "@version": "3.0" } ], "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2022-000021", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/ta/JVNTA91240916/", "@id": "JVNTA#91240916", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN21234459/index.html", "@id": "JVN#21234459", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25949", "@id": "CVE-2022-25949", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26081", "@id": "CVE-2022-26081", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-25969", "@id": "CVE-2022-25969", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-26511", "@id": "CVE-2022-26511", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25949", "@id": "CVE-2022-25949", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-25969", "@id": "CVE-2022-25969", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26081", "@id": "CVE-2022-26081", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-26511", "@id": "CVE-2022-26511", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-119", "@title": "Buffer Errors(CWE-119)" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-Other", "@title": "No Mapping(CWE-Other)" } ], "title": "Multiple vulnerabilities in KINGSOFT \"WPS Office\" and \"KINGSOFT Internet Security\"" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.