jvndb-2015-000075
Vulnerability from jvndb
Published
2015-06-05 14:02
Modified
2015-06-10 16:10
Summary
NetFlow Analyzer fails to restrict access permissions
Details
NetFlow Analyzer provided by Zoho Corporation fails to restrict access permissions.
Tomoshige Hasegawa, Akihito Mukai reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
Impacted products
▼ | Vendor | Product |
---|---|---|
Zoho Corporation | NetFlow Analyzer |
{ "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2015/JVNDB-2015-000075.html", "dc:date": "2015-06-10T16:10+09:00", "dcterms:issued": "2015-06-05T14:02+09:00", "dcterms:modified": "2015-06-10T16:10+09:00", "description": "NetFlow Analyzer provided by Zoho Corporation fails to restrict access permissions.\r\n\r\nTomoshige Hasegawa, Akihito Mukai reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.", "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2015/JVNDB-2015-000075.html", "sec:cpe": { "#text": "cpe:/a:zohocorp:netflow_analyzer", "@product": "NetFlow Analyzer", "@vendor": "Zoho Corporation", "@version": "2.2" }, "sec:cvss": { "@score": "5.0", "@severity": "Medium", "@type": "Base", "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N", "@version": "2.0" }, "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2015-000075", "sec:references": [ { "#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN25598413/index.html", "@id": "JVN#25598413", "@source": "JVN" }, { "#text": "https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-2959", "@id": "CVE-2015-2959", "@source": "CVE" }, { "#text": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2015-2959", "@id": "CVE-2015-2959", "@source": "NVD" }, { "#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html", "@id": "CWE-264", "@title": "Permissions(CWE-264)" } ], "title": "NetFlow Analyzer fails to restrict access permissions" }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.