JVNDB-2011-000110
Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2011-12-26 05:26 - Updated:2011-12-26 05:26Summary
WordPress Japanese vulnerable to cross-site scripting
Details
WordPress Japanese contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
WordPress provided by WordPress.Org is a weblog system. WordPress Japanese contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Katsuhiro Kawahara, Kozo Fukui of Kobe Digital Labo.,Inc. and Yuya Yoshida of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.
JPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.
References
| Type | URL | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||
Impacted products
| Vendor | Product | |
|---|---|---|
{
"@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000110.html",
"dc:date": "2011-12-26T14:26+09:00",
"dcterms:issued": "2011-12-26T14:26+09:00",
"dcterms:modified": "2011-12-26T14:26+09:00",
"description": "WordPress Japanese contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nWordPress provided by WordPress.Org is a weblog system. WordPress Japanese contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.\r\n\r\nKatsuhiro Kawahara, Kozo Fukui of Kobe Digital Labo.,Inc. and Yuya Yoshida of Mitsui Bussan Secure Directions, Inc. reported this vulnerability to IPA.\r\nJPCERT/CC coordinated with the developer under Information Security Early Warning Partnership.",
"link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2011/JVNDB-2011-000110.html",
"sec:cpe": {
"#text": "cpe:/a:wordpress:wordpress",
"@product": "WordPress",
"@vendor": "WordPress.org",
"@version": "2.2"
},
"sec:cvss": {
"@score": "4.3",
"@severity": "Medium",
"@type": "Base",
"@vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"@version": "2.0"
},
"sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2011-000110",
"sec:references": [
{
"#text": "http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN44439553/index.html",
"@id": "JVN#44439553",
"@source": "JVN"
},
{
"#text": "https://www.ipa.go.jp/en/security/vulnerabilities/cwe.html",
"@id": "CWE-79",
"@title": "Cross-site Scripting(CWE-79)"
}
],
"title": "WordPress Japanese vulnerable to cross-site scripting"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…