JVNDB-2005-000695

Vulnerability from jvndb - Published: 2008-05-20 15:00 - Updated:2008-05-20 15:00
Severity
N/A (UNKNOWN) - -
Summary
Ruby XMLRPC Server Denial of Service Vulnerability
Details
The User-level thread supported in Ruby does not switch while writing to a socket. This in turn blocks all subsequent procrsses when specially crafted requests are sent to the Web server and could result in a denial of service.
References
Impacted products
Show details on JVN DB website
To clipboard 

{
  "@rdf:about": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000695.html",
  "dc:date": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:issued": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "dcterms:modified": "2008-05-21T00:00+09:00",
  "description": "The User-level thread supported in Ruby does not switch while writing to a socket. This in turn blocks all subsequent procrsses when specially crafted requests are sent to the Web server and could result in a denial of service.",
  "link": "https://jvndb.jvn.jp/en/contents/2005/JVNDB-2005-000695.html",
  "sec:cpe": [
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/a:ruby-lang:ruby",
      "@product": "Ruby",
      "@vendor": "Ruby",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:misc:miraclelinux_asianux_server",
      "@product": "Asianux Server",
      "@vendor": "Cybertrust Japan Co., Ltd.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux",
      "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux",
      "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    },
    {
      "#text": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux_desktop",
      "@product": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop",
      "@vendor": "Red Hat, Inc.",
      "@version": "2.2"
    }
  ],
  "sec:cvss": {
    "@score": "5.0",
    "@severity": "Medium",
    "@type": "Base",
    "@vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P",
    "@version": "2.0"
  },
  "sec:identifier": "JVNDB-2005-000695",
  "sec:references": [
    {
      "#text": "http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-1931",
      "@id": "CVE-2006-1931",
      "@source": "CVE"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-1931",
      "@id": "CVE-2006-1931",
      "@source": "NVD"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://secunia.com/advisories/16904/",
      "@id": "SA16904",
      "@source": "SECUNIA"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17645",
      "@id": "17645",
      "@source": "BID"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/xfdb/26102",
      "@id": "26102",
      "@source": "XF"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015978",
      "@id": "1015978",
      "@source": "SECTRACK"
    },
    {
      "#text": "http://www.osvdb.org/24972",
      "@id": "24972",
      "@source": "OSVDB"
    }
  ],
  "title": "Ruby XMLRPC Server Denial of Service Vulnerability"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.





Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.