gsd-2024-2214
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-03-07 06:02
Details
In Eclipse ThreadX before version 6.4.0, the _Mtxinit() function in the
Xtensa port was missing an array size check causing a memory overwrite.
The affected file was ports/xtensa/xcc/src/tx_clib_lock.c
Aliases
{ "gsd": { "metadata": { "exploitCode": "unknown", "remediation": "unknown", "reportConfidence": "confirmed", "type": "vulnerability" }, "osvSchema": { "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-2214" ], "details": "In Eclipse ThreadX before version 6.4.0, the _Mtxinit() function in the \nXtensa port was missing an array size check causing a memory overwrite. \nThe affected file was ports/xtensa/xcc/src/tx_clib_lock.c\n\n", "id": "GSD-2024-2214", "modified": "2024-03-07T06:02:27.648495Z", "schema_version": "1.4.0" } }, "namespaces": { "cve.org": { "CVE_data_meta": { "ASSIGNER": "security@eclipse.org", "ID": "CVE-2024-2214", "STATE": "PUBLIC" }, "affects": { "vendor": { "vendor_data": [ { "product": { "product_data": [ { "product_name": "ThreadX", "version": { "version_data": [ { "version_affected": "\u003c", "version_name": "0", "version_value": "6.4.0" } ] } } ] }, "vendor_name": "Eclipse Foundation" } ] } }, "credits": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "Marco Ivaldi" } ], "data_format": "MITRE", "data_type": "CVE", "data_version": "4.0", "description": { "description_data": [ { "lang": "eng", "value": "In Eclipse ThreadX before version 6.4.0, the _Mtxinit() function in the \nXtensa port was missing an array size check causing a memory overwrite. \nThe affected file was ports/xtensa/xcc/src/tx_clib_lock.c\n\n" } ] }, "generator": { "engine": "Vulnogram 0.1.0-dev" }, "impact": { "cvss": [ { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" } ] }, "problemtype": { "problemtype_data": [ { "description": [ { "cweId": "CWE-129", "lang": "eng", "value": "CWE-129 Improper Validation of Array Index" } ] } ] }, "references": { "reference_data": [ { "name": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/threadx/security/advisories/GHSA-vmp6-qhp9-r66x", "refsource": "MISC", "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/threadx/security/advisories/GHSA-vmp6-qhp9-r66x" } ] }, "source": { "discovery": "UNKNOWN" } }, "nvd.nist.gov": { "cve": { "descriptions": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "In Eclipse ThreadX before version 6.4.0, the _Mtxinit() function in the \nXtensa port was missing an array size check causing a memory overwrite. \nThe affected file was ports/xtensa/xcc/src/tx_clib_lock.c\n\n" } ], "id": "CVE-2024-2214", "lastModified": "2024-03-26T17:09:53.043", "metrics": { "cvssMetricV31": [ { "cvssData": { "attackComplexity": "HIGH", "attackVector": "LOCAL", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 7.0, "baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1" }, "exploitabilityScore": 1.0, "impactScore": 5.9, "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "type": "Secondary" } ] }, "published": "2024-03-26T16:15:13.430", "references": [ { "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "url": "https://github.com/eclipse-threadx/threadx/security/advisories/GHSA-vmp6-qhp9-r66x" } ], "sourceIdentifier": "emo@eclipse.org", "vulnStatus": "Awaiting Analysis", "weaknesses": [ { "description": [ { "lang": "en", "value": "CWE-129" } ], "source": "emo@eclipse.org", "type": "Secondary" } ] } } } }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.