gsd-2023-52496
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2024-02-21 06:01
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
mtd: maps: vmu-flash: Fix the (mtd core) switch to ref counters
While switching to ref counters for track mtd devices use, the vmu-flash
driver was forgotten. The reason for reading the ref counter seems
debatable, but let's just fix the build for now.
Aliases
{ gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2023-52496", ], details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmtd: maps: vmu-flash: Fix the (mtd core) switch to ref counters\n\nWhile switching to ref counters for track mtd devices use, the vmu-flash\ndriver was forgotten. The reason for reading the ref counter seems\ndebatable, but let's just fix the build for now.", id: "GSD-2023-52496", modified: "2024-02-21T06:01:53.257240Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "cve@kernel.org", ID: "CVE-2023-52496", STATE: "REJECT", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "** REJECT ** This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { cve: { descriptions: [ { lang: "en", value: "Rejected reason: This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority.", }, ], id: "CVE-2023-52496", lastModified: "2024-03-08T11:15:06.913", metrics: {}, published: "2024-03-08T11:15:06.913", references: [], sourceIdentifier: "416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67", vulnStatus: "Rejected", }, }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.