GSD-2022-3899
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:19Details
The 3dprint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9 does not protect against CSRF attacks in the modified version of Tiny File Manager included with the plugin, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious request that will delete any number of files or directories on the target server by tricking a logged in admin into submitting a form.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2022-3899",
"id": "GSD-2022-3899"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2022-3899"
],
"details": "The 3dprint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9 does not protect against CSRF attacks in the modified version of Tiny File Manager included with the plugin, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious request that will delete any number of files or directories on the target server by tricking a logged in admin into submitting a form.",
"id": "GSD-2022-3899",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:19:40.116791Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "contact@wpscan.com",
"ID": "CVE-2022-3899",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "3dprint",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_affected": "\u003c",
"version_name": "0",
"version_value": "3.5.6.9"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "Unknown"
}
]
}
},
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WPScan team"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WPScan"
}
],
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "The 3dprint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9 does not protect against CSRF attacks in the modified version of Tiny File Manager included with the plugin, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious request that will delete any number of files or directories on the target server by tricking a logged in admin into submitting a form."
}
]
},
"generator": {
"engine": "WPScan CVE Generator"
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e3131e16-a0eb-4d26-b6d3-048fc1f1e9fa/",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e3131e16-a0eb-4d26-b6d3-048fc1f1e9fa/"
}
]
},
"source": {
"discovery": "EXTERNAL"
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:3dprint_project:3dprint:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "4BD26B4C-B1A4-4B9E-9977-FCD70F940C6B",
"versionEndExcluding": "3.5.6.9",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "The 3dprint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9 does not protect against CSRF attacks in the modified version of Tiny File Manager included with the plugin, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious request that will delete any number of files or directories on the target server by tricking a logged in admin into submitting a form."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El complemento 3dprint WordPress anterior a 3.5.6.9 no protege contra ataques CSRF en la versi\u00f3n modificada de Tiny File Manager incluida con el complemento, lo que permite a un atacante crear una solicitud maliciosa que eliminar\u00e1 cualquier cantidad de archivos o directorios en el servidor de destino mediante enga\u00f1ando a un administrador que haya iniciado sesi\u00f3n para enviar un formulario."
}
],
"id": "CVE-2022-3899",
"lastModified": "2024-01-24T15:40:49.577",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.2,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2024-01-16T16:15:10.180",
"references": [
{
"source": "contact@wpscan.com",
"tags": [
"Exploit",
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/e3131e16-a0eb-4d26-b6d3-048fc1f1e9fa/"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "contact@wpscan.com",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-352"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…