GSD-2020-15112

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2020-15112",
    "description": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.",
    "id": "GSD-2020-15112",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15112.html",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1407",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:0916",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2020-15112"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2020-15112"
      ],
      "details": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.",
      "id": "GSD-2020-15112",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:44.094294Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
        "ID": "CVE-2020-15112",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Improper Input Validation in etcd"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "etcd",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 3.3.23"
                        },
                        {
                          "version_value": "\u003c 3.4.10"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "etcd-io"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry."
          }
        ]
      },
      "impact": {
        "cvss": {
          "attackComplexity": "LOW",
          "attackVector": "NETWORK",
          "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
          "baseScore": 6.5,
          "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
          "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
          "integrityImpact": "NONE",
          "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
          "scope": "UNCHANGED",
          "userInteraction": "NONE",
          "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "version": "3.1"
        }
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-20: Improper Input Validation"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
            "refsource": "CONFIRM",
            "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93"
          },
          {
            "name": "FEDORA-2020-cd43b84c16",
            "refsource": "FEDORA",
            "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "advisory": "GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c3.3.23||\u003e=3.4.0 \u003c3.4.10",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 3.3.23, all versions starting from 3.4.0 before 3.4.10",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-129",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-10-06",
          "description": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "3.3.23",
            "3.4.10"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2020-15112",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
            "CVE-2020-15112"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 3.3.23 before 3.4.0, all versions starting from 3.4.10",
          "package_slug": "go/go.etcd.io/etcd/v3",
          "pubdate": "2022-10-06",
          "solution": "Upgrade to versions 3.3.23, 3.4.10 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Validation of Array Index",
          "urls": [
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15112",
            "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/commit/7d1cf640497cbcdfb932e619b13624112c7e3865",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93"
          ],
          "uuid": "38fdf506-dc29-4fe1-9d0c-8ec15a19bbdc"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.3.23",
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:etcd:etcd:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndExcluding": "3.4.10",
                "versionStartIncluding": "3.4.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:32:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "security-advisories@github.com",
          "ID": "CVE-2020-15112"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "In etcd before versions 3.3.23 and 3.4.10, it is possible to have an entry index greater then the number of entries in the ReadAll method in wal/wal.go. This could cause issues when WAL entries are being read during consensus as an arbitrary etcd consensus participant could go down from a runtime panic when reading the entry."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-129"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93",
              "refsource": "CONFIRM",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-m332-53r6-2w93"
            },
            {
              "name": "FEDORA-2020-cd43b84c16",
              "refsource": "FEDORA",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L6B6R43Y7M3DCHWK3L3UVGE2K6WWECMP/"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "SINGLE",
            "availabilityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "baseScore": 4.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 8.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "HIGH",
            "baseScore": 6.5,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2021-11-18T18:30Z",
      "publishedDate": "2020-08-05T20:15Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…