GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2018-5382

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type "BKS-V1" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of "BKS-V1" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2018-5382",
    "description": "The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type \"BKS-V1\" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of \"BKS-V1\" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself.",
    "id": "GSD-2018-5382",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5382.html",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2018-5382"
      ],
      "details": "The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type \"BKS-V1\" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of \"BKS-V1\" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself.",
      "id": "GSD-2018-5382",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:39.706184Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
        "DATE_PUBLIC": "2012-03-20T00:00:00.000Z",
        "ID": "CVE-2018-5382",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC",
        "TITLE": "Bouncy Castle BKS-V1 keystore files vulnerable to trivial hash collisions"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "Bouncy Castle",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "affected": "\u003c",
                          "version_name": "all",
                          "version_value": "1.47"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "Legion of the Bouncy Castle"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type \"BKS-V1\" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of \"BKS-V1\" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "CWE-327: Use of a Broken or Risky Cryptographic Algorithm"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "103453",
            "refsource": "BID",
            "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103453"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2018:2927",
            "refsource": "REDHAT",
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927"
          },
          {
            "name": "VU#306792",
            "refsource": "CERT-VN",
            "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/306792"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/releasenotes.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/releasenotes.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
          }
        ]
      },
      "source": {
        "discovery": "UNKNOWN"
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "(,1.50)",
          "affected_versions": "All versions before 1.50",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-354",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2022-06-28",
          "description": "The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type \"BKS-V1\" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of \"BKS-V1\" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "1.50"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2018-5382",
          "identifiers": [
            "GHSA-8477-3v39-ggpm",
            "CVE-2018-5382"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions starting from 1.50",
          "package_slug": "maven/org.bouncycastle/bcprov-jdk15on",
          "pubdate": "2022-05-13",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 1.50 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-5382",
            "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927",
            "https://www.bouncycastle.org/releasenotes.html",
            "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/306792",
            "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
            "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103453",
            "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8477-3v39-ggpm"
          ],
          "uuid": "dc59cfcc-5073-4b3b-affa-bea06f145b30"
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:bouncycastle:legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "1.49",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          },
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite:6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              },
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:redhat:satellite_capsule:6.4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2018-5382"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "The default BKS keystore use an HMAC that is only 16 bits long, which can allow an attacker to compromise the integrity of a BKS keystore. Bouncy Castle release 1.47 changes the BKS format to a format which uses a 160 bit HMAC instead. This applies to any BKS keystore generated prior to BC 1.47. For situations where people need to create the files for legacy reasons a specific keystore type \"BKS-V1\" was introduced in 1.49. It should be noted that the use of \"BKS-V1\" is discouraged by the library authors and should only be used where it is otherwise safe to do so, as in where the use of a 16 bit checksum for the file integrity check is not going to cause a security issue in itself."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-354"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "VU#306792",
              "refsource": "CERT-VN",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "US Government Resource"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/306792"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/releasenotes.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Release Notes",
                "Vendor Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.bouncycastle.org/releasenotes.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "103453",
              "refsource": "BID",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory",
                "VDB Entry"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/103453"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2018:2927",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2927"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "LOCAL",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 3.6,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 4.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "LOW",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "LOCAL",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 4.4,
            "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
            "confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
            "integrityImpact": "LOW",
            "privilegesRequired": "LOW",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
            "version": "3.1"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 1.8,
          "impactScore": 2.5
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2022-04-20T15:31Z",
      "publishedDate": "2018-04-16T14:29Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…