GSD-2018-12907

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:22
Details
In Rclone 1.42, use of "rclone sync" to migrate data between two Google Cloud Storage buckets might allow attackers to trigger the transmission of any URL's content to Google, because there is no validation of a URL field received from the Google Cloud Storage API server, aka a "RESTLESS" issue.
Aliases
Aliases
CVE-2018-12907
To clipboard 

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2018-12907",
    "description": "In Rclone 1.42, use of \"rclone sync\" to migrate data between two Google Cloud Storage buckets might allow attackers to trigger the transmission of any URL\u0027s content to Google, because there is no validation of a URL field received from the Google Cloud Storage API server, aka a \"RESTLESS\" issue.",
    "id": "GSD-2018-12907",
    "references": [
      "https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12907.html"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2018-12907"
      ],
      "details": "In Rclone 1.42, use of \"rclone sync\" to migrate data between two Google Cloud Storage buckets might allow attackers to trigger the transmission of any URL\u0027s content to Google, because there is no validation of a URL field received from the Google Cloud Storage API server, aka a \"RESTLESS\" issue.",
      "id": "GSD-2018-12907",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:22:30.291105Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2018-12907",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "In Rclone 1.42, use of \"rclone sync\" to migrate data between two Google Cloud Storage buckets might allow attackers to trigger the transmission of any URL\u0027s content to Google, because there is no validation of a URL field received from the Google Cloud Storage API server, aka a \"RESTLESS\" issue."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/27/3",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/27/3"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://www.danieldent.com/blog/restless-vulnerability-non-browser-cross-domain-http-request-attacks/",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://www.danieldent.com/blog/restless-vulnerability-non-browser-cross-domain-http-request-attacks/"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:rclone:rclone:1.42:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2018-12907"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "In Rclone 1.42, use of \"rclone sync\" to migrate data between two Google Cloud Storage buckets might allow attackers to trigger the transmission of any URL\u0027s content to Google, because there is no validation of a URL field received from the Google Cloud Storage API server, aka a \"RESTLESS\" issue."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-200"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://www.danieldent.com/blog/restless-vulnerability-non-browser-cross-domain-http-request-attacks/",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Mitigation",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://www.danieldent.com/blog/restless-vulnerability-non-browser-cross-domain-http-request-attacks/"
            },
            {
              "name": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/27/3",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/27/3"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
            "integrityImpact": "NONE",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2018-08-31T16:10Z",
      "publishedDate": "2018-06-27T13:29Z"
    }
  }
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.



Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.