GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GSD-2017-18367

Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21
Details
libseccomp-golang 0.9.0 and earlier incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument.
Aliases
Aliases

{
  "GSD": {
    "alias": "CVE-2017-18367",
    "description": "libseccomp-golang 0.9.0 and earlier incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument.",
    "id": "GSD-2017-18367",
    "references": [
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2479",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4090",
      "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4087",
      "https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18367"
    ]
  },
  "gsd": {
    "metadata": {
      "exploitCode": "unknown",
      "remediation": "unknown",
      "reportConfidence": "confirmed",
      "type": "vulnerability"
    },
    "osvSchema": {
      "aliases": [
        "CVE-2017-18367"
      ],
      "details": "libseccomp-golang 0.9.0 and earlier incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument.",
      "id": "GSD-2017-18367",
      "modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:11.096000Z",
      "schema_version": "1.4.0"
    }
  },
  "namespaces": {
    "cve.org": {
      "CVE_data_meta": {
        "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
        "ID": "CVE-2017-18367",
        "STATE": "PUBLIC"
      },
      "affects": {
        "vendor": {
          "vendor_data": [
            {
              "product": {
                "product_data": [
                  {
                    "product_name": "n/a",
                    "version": {
                      "version_data": [
                        {
                          "version_value": "n/a"
                        }
                      ]
                    }
                  }
                ]
              },
              "vendor_name": "n/a"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "data_format": "MITRE",
      "data_type": "CVE",
      "data_version": "4.0",
      "description": {
        "description_data": [
          {
            "lang": "eng",
            "value": "libseccomp-golang 0.9.0 and earlier incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument."
          }
        ]
      },
      "problemtype": {
        "problemtype_data": [
          {
            "description": [
              {
                "lang": "eng",
                "value": "n/a"
              }
            ]
          }
        ]
      },
      "references": {
        "reference_data": [
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/22",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/22"
          },
          {
            "name": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/commit/06e7a29f36a34b8cf419aeb87b979ee508e58f9e",
            "refsource": "MISC",
            "url": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/commit/06e7a29f36a34b8cf419aeb87b979ee508e58f9e"
          },
          {
            "name": "[oss-security] 20190425 Re: CVE Request: golang-seccomp incorrectly handles multiple syscall arguments",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/25/6"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:4087",
            "refsource": "REDHAT",
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4087"
          },
          {
            "name": "RHSA-2019:4090",
            "refsource": "REDHAT",
            "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4090"
          },
          {
            "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20200811 [SECURITY] [DLA 2320-1] golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang security update",
            "refsource": "MLIST",
            "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00016.html"
          },
          {
            "name": "USN-4574-1",
            "refsource": "UBUNTU",
            "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4574-1/"
          }
        ]
      }
    },
    "gitlab.com": {
      "advisories": [
        {
          "affected_range": "\u003c=v0.9.0",
          "affected_versions": "All versions up to 0.9.0",
          "cvss_v2": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
          "cvss_v3": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
          "cwe_ids": [
            "CWE-1035",
            "CWE-20",
            "CWE-937"
          ],
          "date": "2019-12-17",
          "description": "libseccomp-golang incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument.",
          "fixed_versions": [
            "v0.9.1"
          ],
          "identifier": "CVE-2017-18367",
          "identifiers": [
            "CVE-2017-18367"
          ],
          "not_impacted": "All versions after 0.9.0",
          "package_slug": "go/github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang",
          "pubdate": "2019-04-24",
          "solution": "Upgrade to version 0.9.1 or above.",
          "title": "Improper Input Validation",
          "urls": [
            "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-18367"
          ],
          "uuid": "b3d21499-7bfb-4820-be28-f824f85d1e45",
          "versions": [
            {
              "commit": {
                "sha": "44c40e5fa986cc5e09a6528581fefb95c578d343",
                "tags": [
                  "v0.9.0"
                ],
                "timestamp": "20170105224618"
              },
              "number": "v0.9.0"
            },
            {
              "commit": {
                "sha": "8107a3debc22fba7e6e48099eb3e1090bf6c78ba",
                "tags": [
                  "v0.9.1"
                ],
                "timestamp": "20190521233100"
              },
              "number": "v0.9.1"
            }
          ]
        }
      ]
    },
    "nvd.nist.gov": {
      "configurations": {
        "CVE_data_version": "4.0",
        "nodes": [
          {
            "children": [],
            "cpe_match": [
              {
                "cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:libseccomp-golang_project:libseccomp-golang:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
                "cpe_name": [],
                "versionEndIncluding": "0.9.0",
                "vulnerable": true
              }
            ],
            "operator": "OR"
          }
        ]
      },
      "cve": {
        "CVE_data_meta": {
          "ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
          "ID": "CVE-2017-18367"
        },
        "data_format": "MITRE",
        "data_type": "CVE",
        "data_version": "4.0",
        "description": {
          "description_data": [
            {
              "lang": "en",
              "value": "libseccomp-golang 0.9.0 and earlier incorrectly generates BPFs that OR multiple arguments rather than ANDing them. A process running under a restrictive seccomp filter that specified multiple syscall arguments could bypass intended access restrictions by specifying a single matching argument."
            }
          ]
        },
        "problemtype": {
          "problemtype_data": [
            {
              "description": [
                {
                  "lang": "en",
                  "value": "CWE-20"
                }
              ]
            }
          ]
        },
        "references": {
          "reference_data": [
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/22",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/issues/22"
            },
            {
              "name": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/commit/06e7a29f36a34b8cf419aeb87b979ee508e58f9e",
              "refsource": "MISC",
              "tags": [
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp-golang/commit/06e7a29f36a34b8cf419aeb87b979ee508e58f9e"
            },
            {
              "name": "[oss-security] 20190425 Re: CVE Request: golang-seccomp incorrectly handles multiple syscall arguments",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [
                "Mailing List",
                "Patch",
                "Third Party Advisory"
              ],
              "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/25/6"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:4087",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4087"
            },
            {
              "name": "RHSA-2019:4090",
              "refsource": "REDHAT",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:4090"
            },
            {
              "name": "[debian-lts-announce] 20200811 [SECURITY] [DLA 2320-1] golang-github-seccomp-libseccomp-golang security update",
              "refsource": "MLIST",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2020/08/msg00016.html"
            },
            {
              "name": "USN-4574-1",
              "refsource": "UBUNTU",
              "tags": [],
              "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4574-1/"
            }
          ]
        }
      },
      "impact": {
        "baseMetricV2": {
          "acInsufInfo": false,
          "cvssV2": {
            "accessComplexity": "LOW",
            "accessVector": "NETWORK",
            "authentication": "NONE",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 5.0,
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
            "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
            "version": "2.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
          "impactScore": 2.9,
          "obtainAllPrivilege": false,
          "obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
          "obtainUserPrivilege": false,
          "severity": "MEDIUM",
          "userInteractionRequired": false
        },
        "baseMetricV3": {
          "cvssV3": {
            "attackComplexity": "LOW",
            "attackVector": "NETWORK",
            "availabilityImpact": "NONE",
            "baseScore": 7.5,
            "baseSeverity": "HIGH",
            "confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
            "integrityImpact": "HIGH",
            "privilegesRequired": "NONE",
            "scope": "UNCHANGED",
            "userInteraction": "NONE",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
            "version": "3.0"
          },
          "exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
          "impactScore": 3.6
        }
      },
      "lastModifiedDate": "2020-10-14T22:15Z",
      "publishedDate": "2019-04-24T21:29Z"
    }
  }
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…