GSD-2016-5672
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2016-5672",
"description": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
"id": "GSD-2016-5672"
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-5672"
],
"details": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.",
"id": "GSD-2016-5672",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:25.143632Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
"ID": "CVE-2016-5672",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
},
{
"name": "92199",
"refsource": "BID",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
},
{
"name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
},
{
"name": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
},
{
"name": "[crosswalk-help] 20160728 Crosswalk Security Advisory",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
},
{
"name": "20160729 CVE-2016-5672: Intel Crosswalk SSL Prompt Issue",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"name": "VU#217871",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"configurations": {
"CVE_data_version": "4.0",
"nodes": [
{
"children": [],
"cpe_match": [
{
"cpe23Uri": "cpe:2.3:a:intel:crosswalk:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"cpe_name": [],
"versionEndIncluding": "19.49.514.4",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
"cve": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cert@cert.org",
"ID": "CVE-2016-5672"
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user\u0027s acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-310"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-20"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory"
],
"url": "https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue"
},
{
"name": "[crosswalk-help] 20160728 Crosswalk Security Advisory",
"refsource": "MLIST",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html"
},
{
"name": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Permissions Required",
"Technical Description"
],
"url": "https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986"
},
{
"name": "VU#217871",
"refsource": "CERT-VN",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"US Government Resource"
],
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871"
},
{
"name": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"tags": [
"Vendor Advisory"
],
"url": "https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/"
},
{
"name": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html",
"refsource": "MISC",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html"
},
{
"name": "92199",
"refsource": "BID",
"tags": [
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199"
},
{
"name": "20160729 CVE-2016-5672: Intel Crosswalk SSL Prompt Issue",
"refsource": "BUGTRAQ",
"tags": [],
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded"
}
]
}
},
"impact": {
"baseMetricV2": {
"cvssV2": {
"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.8,
"confidentialityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 8.6,
"impactScore": 4.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"severity": "MEDIUM",
"userInteractionRequired": true
},
"baseMetricV3": {
"cvssV3": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.1,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "HIGH",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"userInteraction": "REQUIRED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 2.8,
"impactScore": 5.2
}
},
"lastModifiedDate": "2018-10-09T20:00Z",
"publishedDate": "2016-08-01T02:59Z"
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…
The MITRE ATT&CK techniques below are AI-generated suggestions, inferred from the description of the
vulnerability by the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-classification-roberta-base
model, served locally by ML-Gateway.
They have not been verified by an analyst and are provided for guidance only.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Loading…
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.
Loading…