GSD-2016-4029
Vulnerability from gsd - Updated: 2023-12-13 01:21Details
WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address.
Aliases
Aliases
{
"GSD": {
"alias": "CVE-2016-4029",
"description": "WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address.",
"id": "GSD-2016-4029",
"references": [
"https://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3681"
]
},
"gsd": {
"metadata": {
"exploitCode": "unknown",
"remediation": "unknown",
"reportConfidence": "confirmed",
"type": "vulnerability"
},
"osvSchema": {
"aliases": [
"CVE-2016-4029"
],
"details": "WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address.",
"id": "GSD-2016-4029",
"modified": "2023-12-13T01:21:18.872856Z",
"schema_version": "1.4.0"
}
},
"namespaces": {
"cve.org": {
"CVE_data_meta": {
"ASSIGNER": "cve@mitre.org",
"ID": "CVE-2016-4029",
"STATE": "PUBLIC"
},
"affects": {
"vendor": {
"vendor_data": [
{
"product": {
"product_data": [
{
"product_name": "n/a",
"version": {
"version_data": [
{
"version_value": "n/a"
}
]
}
}
]
},
"vendor_name": "n/a"
}
]
}
},
"data_format": "MITRE",
"data_type": "CVE",
"data_version": "4.0",
"description": {
"description_data": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address."
}
]
},
"problemtype": {
"problemtype_data": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "eng",
"value": "n/a"
}
]
}
]
},
"references": {
"reference_data": [
{
"name": "1036594",
"refsource": "SECTRACK",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036594"
},
{
"name": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/8473",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/8473"
},
{
"name": "http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.5",
"refsource": "CONFIRM",
"url": "http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.5"
},
{
"name": "DSA-3681",
"refsource": "DEBIAN",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3681"
},
{
"name": "https://core.trac.wordpress.org/query?status=closed\u0026milestone=4.5",
"refsource": "MISC",
"url": "https://core.trac.wordpress.org/query?status=closed\u0026milestone=4.5"
}
]
}
},
"nvd.nist.gov": {
"cve": {
"configurations": [
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:a:wordpress:wordpress:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "47CE68DF-6C7B-4CD4-BFA7-DE2D97EC961F",
"versionEndExcluding": "4.5",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
},
{
"nodes": [
{
"cpeMatch": [
{
"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",
"matchCriteriaId": "C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43",
"vulnerable": true
}
],
"negate": false,
"operator": "OR"
}
]
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "WordPress before 4.5 does not consider octal and hexadecimal IP address formats when determining an intranet address, which allows remote attackers to bypass an intended SSRF protection mechanism via a crafted address."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "WordPress en versiones anteriores a 4.5 no considera formatos de direcci\u00f3n IP octal y hexadecimal cuando determina una direcci\u00f3n de intranet, lo que permite a atacantes remotos eludir un mecanismo de protecci\u00f3n SSRF intencionado a trav\u00e9s de una direcci\u00f3n manipulada."
}
],
"evaluatorComment": "CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)",
"id": "CVE-2016-4029",
"lastModified": "2024-02-08T19:56:14.470",
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV2": [
{
"acInsufInfo": false,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"cvssData": {
"accessComplexity": "LOW",
"accessVector": "NETWORK",
"authentication": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 5.0,
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "PARTIAL",
"vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N",
"version": "2.0"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 10.0,
"impactScore": 2.9,
"obtainAllPrivilege": false,
"obtainOtherPrivilege": false,
"obtainUserPrivilege": false,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary",
"userInteractionRequired": false
}
],
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"cvssData": {
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE",
"baseScore": 8.6,
"baseSeverity": "HIGH",
"confidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"integrityImpact": "HIGH",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"scope": "CHANGED",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N",
"version": "3.1"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 4.0,
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
},
"published": "2016-08-07T16:59:00.143",
"references": [
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Release Notes"
],
"url": "http://codex.wordpress.org/Version_4.5"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Mailing List"
],
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3681"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Broken Link",
"Third Party Advisory",
"VDB Entry"
],
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036594"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Patch"
],
"url": "https://core.trac.wordpress.org/query?status=closed\u0026milestone=4.5"
},
{
"source": "cve@mitre.org",
"tags": [
"Broken Link"
],
"url": "https://wpvulndb.com/vulnerabilities/8473"
}
],
"sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org",
"vulnStatus": "Analyzed",
"weaknesses": [
{
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-918"
}
],
"source": "nvd@nist.gov",
"type": "Primary"
}
]
}
}
}
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…