gsd-2011-2738
Vulnerability from gsd
Modified
2023-12-13 01:19
Details
Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.
Aliases
Aliases
{ GSD: { alias: "CVE-2011-2738", description: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.", id: "GSD-2011-2738", }, gsd: { metadata: { exploitCode: "unknown", remediation: "unknown", reportConfidence: "confirmed", type: "vulnerability", }, osvSchema: { aliases: [ "CVE-2011-2738", ], details: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.", id: "GSD-2011-2738", modified: "2023-12-13T01:19:06.640089Z", schema_version: "1.4.0", }, }, namespaces: { "cve.org": { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "security_alert@emc.com", ID: "CVE-2011-2738", STATE: "PUBLIC", }, affects: { vendor: { vendor_data: [ { product: { product_data: [ { product_name: "n/a", version: { version_data: [ { version_value: "n/a", }, ], }, }, ], }, vendor_name: "n/a", }, ], }, }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "eng", value: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "eng", value: "n/a", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "46052", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46052", }, { name: "1026048", refsource: "SECTRACK", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026048", }, { name: "46053", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46053", }, { name: "45979", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/45979", }, { name: "20110914 CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities", refsource: "CISCO", url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351f.shtml", }, { name: "75442", refsource: "OSVDB", url: "http://www.osvdb.org/75442", }, { name: "cisco-unspecified-code-execution(69828)", refsource: "XF", url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69828", }, { name: "46016", refsource: "SECUNIA", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46016", }, { name: "49627", refsource: "BID", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49627", }, { name: "49644", refsource: "BID", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49644", }, { name: "20110914 Cisco Unified Service Monitor and Cisco Unified Operations Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities", refsource: "CISCO", url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351e.shtml", }, { name: "1026059", refsource: "SECTRACK", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026059", }, { name: "1026047", refsource: "SECTRACK", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026047", }, { name: "1026046", refsource: "SECTRACK", url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026046", }, { name: "20110914 ESA-2011-029: Buffer overflow vulnerability in multiple EMC Ionix products", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/519646/100/0/threaded", }, ], }, }, "nvd.nist.gov": { configurations: { CVE_data_version: "4.0", nodes: [ { children: [ { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "8.5", vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_service_monitor:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.0.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.0.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:3.0:december_2007:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:3.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:4.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "8.5", vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:unified_operations_manager:2.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:3.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:cisco:ciscoworks_lan_management_solution:3.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], cpe_match: [], operator: "AND", }, { children: [], cpe_match: [ { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:emc:ionix_ip:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "8.1.1.1", vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:emc:ionix_acm:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "2.3", vulnerable: true, }, { cpe23Uri: "cpe:2.3:a:emc:ionix_asam:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", cpe_name: [], versionEndIncluding: "3.2.0.2", vulnerable: true, }, ], operator: "OR", }, ], }, cve: { CVE_data_meta: { ASSIGNER: "secure@dell.com", ID: "CVE-2011-2738", }, data_format: "MITRE", data_type: "CVE", data_version: "4.0", description: { description_data: [ { lang: "en", value: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Service Monitor before 8.6, as used in Unified Operations Manager before 8.6 and CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.x and 4.x before 4.1; and multiple EMC Ionix products including Application Connectivity Monitor (Ionix ACM) 2.3 and earlier, Adapter for Alcatel-Lucent 5620 SAM EMS (Ionix ASAM) 3.2.0.2 and earlier, IP Management Suite (Ionix IP) 8.1.1.1 and earlier, and other Ionix products; allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets to TCP port 9002, aka Bug IDs CSCtn42961 and CSCtn64922, related to a buffer overflow.", }, ], }, problemtype: { problemtype_data: [ { description: [ { lang: "en", value: "NVD-CWE-noinfo", }, ], }, ], }, references: { reference_data: [ { name: "20110914 CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities", refsource: "CISCO", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351f.shtml", }, { name: "20110914 Cisco Unified Service Monitor and Cisco Unified Operations Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerabilities", refsource: "CISCO", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b9351e.shtml", }, { name: "45979", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/45979", }, { name: "75442", refsource: "OSVDB", tags: [], url: "http://www.osvdb.org/75442", }, { name: "46016", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46016", }, { name: "49644", refsource: "BID", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49644", }, { name: "1026059", refsource: "SECTRACK", tags: [], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026059", }, { name: "46053", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46053", }, { name: "1026047", refsource: "SECTRACK", tags: [], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026047", }, { name: "1026048", refsource: "SECTRACK", tags: [], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026048", }, { name: "1026046", refsource: "SECTRACK", tags: [], url: "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026046", }, { name: "49627", refsource: "BID", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49627", }, { name: "46052", refsource: "SECUNIA", tags: [ "Vendor Advisory", ], url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/46052", }, { name: "cisco-unspecified-code-execution(69828)", refsource: "XF", tags: [], url: "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69828", }, { name: "20110914 ESA-2011-029: Buffer overflow vulnerability in multiple EMC Ionix products", refsource: "BUGTRAQ", tags: [], url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/519646/100/0/threaded", }, ], }, }, impact: { baseMetricV2: { cvssV2: { accessComplexity: "LOW", accessVector: "NETWORK", authentication: "NONE", availabilityImpact: "COMPLETE", baseScore: 10, confidentialityImpact: "COMPLETE", integrityImpact: "COMPLETE", vectorString: "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", version: "2.0", }, exploitabilityScore: 10, impactScore: 10, obtainAllPrivilege: false, obtainOtherPrivilege: false, obtainUserPrivilege: false, severity: "HIGH", userInteractionRequired: false, }, }, lastModifiedDate: "2018-10-09T19:32Z", publishedDate: "2011-09-19T12:02Z", }, }, }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.