ghsa-xv4r-xrmj-c649
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-12-27 15:31
Modified
2024-12-27 15:31
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/stacktrace: Use break instead of return statement
arch_stack_walk_user_common() contains a return statement instead of a break statement in case store_ip() fails while trying to store a callchain entry of a user space process. This may lead to a missing pagefault_enable() call.
If this happens any subsequent page fault of the process won't be resolved by the page fault handler and this in turn will lead to the process being killed.
Use a break instead of a return statement to fix this.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-56550", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-12-27T15:15:13Z", severity: null, }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/stacktrace: Use break instead of return statement\n\narch_stack_walk_user_common() contains a return statement instead of a\nbreak statement in case store_ip() fails while trying to store a callchain\nentry of a user space process.\nThis may lead to a missing pagefault_enable() call.\n\nIf this happens any subsequent page fault of the process won't be resolved\nby the page fault handler and this in turn will lead to the process being\nkilled.\n\nUse a break instead of a return statement to fix this.", id: "GHSA-xv4r-xrmj-c649", modified: "2024-12-27T15:31:53Z", published: "2024-12-27T15:31:53Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-56550", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20c26357826457dc7c8145297e60ddc012e18914", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/588a9836a4ef7ec3bfcffda526dfa399637e6cfc", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.