ghsa-xqw5-f5f6-22vf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2025-02-27 03:34
Modified
2025-02-27 03:34
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
arm64: cacheinfo: Avoid out-of-bounds write to cacheinfo array
The loop that detects/populates cache information already has a bounds check on the array size but does not account for cache levels with separate data/instructions cache. Fix this by incrementing the index for any populated leaf (instead of any populated level).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2025-21785" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-27T03:15:19Z", "severity": null }, "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\narm64: cacheinfo: Avoid out-of-bounds write to cacheinfo array\n\nThe loop that detects/populates cache information already has a bounds\ncheck on the array size but does not account for cache levels with\nseparate data/instructions cache. Fix this by incrementing the index\nfor any populated leaf (instead of any populated level).", "id": "GHSA-xqw5-f5f6-22vf", "modified": "2025-02-27T03:34:06Z", "published": "2025-02-27T03:34:06Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21785" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4ff25f0b18d1d0174c105e4620428bcdc1213860" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/67b99a2b5811df4294c2ad50f9bff3b6a08bd618" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/715eb1af64779e1b1aa0a7b2ffb81414d9f708e5" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/875d742cf5327c93cba1f11e12b08d3cce7a88d2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab90894f33c15b14c1cee6959ab6c8dcb09127f8" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.