ghsa-xp52-49j5-h754
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:36
Modified
2024-03-27 18:32
Severity ?
Details
Due to use of a dangling pointer, libcurl 7.29.0 through 7.71.1 can use the wrong connection when sending data.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-8231", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-416", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2020-12-14T20:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Due to use of a dangling pointer, libcurl 7.29.0 through 7.71.1 can use the wrong connection when sending data.", id: "GHSA-xp52-49j5-h754", modified: "2024-03-27T18:32:37Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:36:22Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-8231", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://hackerone.com/reports/948876", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://curl.haxx.se/docs/CVE-2020-8231.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58af02e294bd07f487e2c64ffc0a29b837db5600e33b6e698b9d696b@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4%40%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf4c02775860db415b4955778a131c2795223f61cb8c6a450893651e4@%3Cissues.bookkeeper.apache.org%3E", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202012-14", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4881", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.