ghsa-xjw2-6jm9-rf67
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-08-30 20:47
Modified
2023-08-30 20:47
Severity ?
Summary
Sandbox escape via various forms of "format".
Details
Impact
Python's "format" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to "read" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure.
With RestrictedPython
, the format functionality is available via the format
and format_map
methods of str
(and unicode
) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via string.Formatter
.
All known versions of RestrictedPython
are vulnerable.
Patches
The issue will be fixed in 5.4 and 6.2.
Workarounds
There are no workarounds to fix the issue without upgrading.
References
- https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.format_map
- http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2016/12/29/careful-with-str-format/
- https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51580
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in the RestrictedPython issue tracker
- Email us at security@plone.org
Credits
Thanks for analysing and reporting the go to:
- Abhishek Govindarasu
- Ankush Menat
- Ward Theunisse
{ "affected": [ { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 5.3" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "RestrictedPython" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "0" }, { "fixed": "5.4" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] }, { "database_specific": { "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 6.1" }, "package": { "ecosystem": "PyPI", "name": "RestrictedPython" }, "ranges": [ { "events": [ { "introduced": "6.0" }, { "fixed": "6.2" } ], "type": "ECOSYSTEM" } ] } ], "aliases": [ "CVE-2023-41039" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-74" ], "github_reviewed": true, "github_reviewed_at": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z", "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-30T18:15:09Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "### Impact\nPython\u0027s \"format\" functionality allows someone controlling the format string to \"read\" all objects accessible through recursive attribute lookup and subscription from objects he can access. This can lead to critical information disclosure.\nWith `RestrictedPython`, the format functionality is available via the `format` and `format_map` methods of `str` (and `unicode`) (accessed either via the class or its instances) and via `string.Formatter`.\nAll known versions of `RestrictedPython` are vulnerable. \n\n### Patches\nThe issue will be fixed in 5.4 and 6.2.\n\n### Workarounds\nThere are no workarounds to fix the issue without upgrading.\n\n### References\n* https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#str.format_map\n* http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2016/12/29/careful-with-str-format/\n* https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/51580\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in the [RestrictedPython issue tracker](https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/issues)\n* Email us at [security@plone.org](mailto:security@plone.org)\n\n### Credits\n\nThanks for analysing and reporting the go to:\n\n* Abhishek Govindarasu\n* Ankush Menat\n* Ward Theunisse\n\n", "id": "GHSA-xjw2-6jm9-rf67", "modified": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z", "published": "2023-08-30T20:47:58Z", "references": [ { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/security/advisories/GHSA-xjw2-6jm9-rf67" }, { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41039" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython/commit/4134aedcff17c977da7717693ed89ce56d54c120" }, { "type": "PACKAGE", "url": "https://github.com/zopefoundation/RestrictedPython" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ], "summary": "Sandbox escape via various forms of \"format\"." }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.