GHSA-XFFQ-RX82-3974
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:59 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:59
VLAI
Details
JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1911"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-09-20T10:55:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "JasperServer in JasperReports Server Community Project 3.7.0 and 3.7.1 uses a predictable _flowExecutionKey parameter, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via a brute-force approach.",
"id": "GHSA-xffq-rx82-3974",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:59:31Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:59:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1911"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69849"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.csirtcv.gva.es/es/alertas/vulnerabilidad-en-jasperserver.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.csirtcv.gva.es/sites/all/files/images/content/%5BCSIRT-cv%5D%20JasperServer%203.7.0%20CE%20CSRF%20Advisory.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/519588"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/MAPG-8ELLJC"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49649"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…