ghsa-x8j5-r4w2-j865
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:19
Modified
2022-05-17 05:19
Details
The SIP over UDP implementation in Asterisk Open Source 1.4.x before 1.4.43, 1.6.x before 1.6.2.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.7.2 uses different port numbers for responses to invalid requests depending on whether a SIP username exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate usernames via a series of requests.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-4597" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-200" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-12-15T03:57:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The SIP over UDP implementation in Asterisk Open Source 1.4.x before 1.4.43, 1.6.x before 1.6.2.21, and 1.8.x before 1.8.7.2 uses different port numbers for responses to invalid requests depending on whether a SIP username exists, which allows remote attackers to enumerate usernames via a series of requests.", "id": "GHSA-x8j5-r4w2-j865", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:19:14Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:19:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4597" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2011-12/0151.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2011-013.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2011-November/052191.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/12/09/3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/12/09/4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/77597" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/47273" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2367" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.