ghsa-x8fv-7pqq-qwxw
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:13
Modified
2022-05-02 03:13
Details

The Word processor in OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 through 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) .doc, (2) .wri, or (3) .rtf Word 97 file that triggers memory corruption, as exploited in the wild in December 2008, as demonstrated by 2008-crash.doc.rar, and a similar issue to CVE-2008-4841.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-0259"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-01-22T23:30:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "The Word processor in OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 through 1.1.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) .doc, (2) .wri, or (3) .rtf Word 97 file that triggers memory corruption, as exploited in the wild in December 2008, as demonstrated by 2008-crash.doc.rar, and a similar issue to CVE-2008-4841.",
  "id": "GHSA-x8fv-7pqq-qwxw",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:13:52Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:13:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0259"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/48213"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6560"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://milw0rm.com/sploits/2008-crash.doc.rar"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/01/21/9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33383"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.