GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-X7FV-MVJX-M6C8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 15:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

erofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block address is zero

syzkaller reported a memleak: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=62f37ff612f0021641eda5b17f056f1668aa9aed

unreferenced object 0xffff88811009c7f8 (size 136): ... backtrace: [] z_erofs_do_read_page+0x99b/0x1740 [] z_erofs_readahead+0x24e/0x580 [] read_pages+0x86/0x3d0 ...

syzkaller constructed a case: in z_erofs_register_pcluster(), ztailpacking = false and map->m_pa = zero. This makes pcl->obj.index be zero although pcl is not a inline pcluster.

Then following path adds refcount for grp, but the refcount won't be put because pcl is inline.

z_erofs_readahead() z_erofs_do_read_page() # for another page z_erofs_collector_begin() erofs_find_workgroup() erofs_workgroup_get()

Since it's illegal for the block address of a non-inlined pcluster to be zero, add check here to avoid registering the pcluster which would be leaked.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-50743"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T13:16:01Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nerofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block address is zero\n\nsyzkaller reported a memleak:\nhttps://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=62f37ff612f0021641eda5b17f056f1668aa9aed\n\nunreferenced object 0xffff88811009c7f8 (size 136):\n  ...\n  backtrace:\n    [\u003cffffffff821db19b\u003e] z_erofs_do_read_page+0x99b/0x1740\n    [\u003cffffffff821dee9e\u003e] z_erofs_readahead+0x24e/0x580\n    [\u003cffffffff814bc0d6\u003e] read_pages+0x86/0x3d0\n    ...\n\nsyzkaller constructed a case: in z_erofs_register_pcluster(),\nztailpacking = false and map-\u003em_pa = zero. This makes pcl-\u003eobj.index be\nzero although pcl is not a inline pcluster.\n\nThen following path adds refcount for grp, but the refcount won\u0027t be put\nbecause pcl is inline.\n\nz_erofs_readahead()\n  z_erofs_do_read_page() # for another page\n    z_erofs_collector_begin()\n      erofs_find_workgroup()\n        erofs_workgroup_get()\n\nSince it\u0027s illegal for the block address of a non-inlined pcluster to\nbe zero, add check here to avoid registering the pcluster which would\nbe leaked.",
  "id": "GHSA-x7fv-mvjx-m6c8",
  "modified": "2025-12-24T15:30:33Z",
  "published": "2025-12-24T15:30:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-50743"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/618e712b99c78d1004b70a1a9ab0a4830d0b2673"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ac54c1f7b288d83b6ba1e320efff24ecc21309cd"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c42c0ffe81176940bd5dead474216b7198d77675"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…