ghsa-x38c-xq6c-937h
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:04
Modified
2024-07-16 18:31
Severity ?
Details
Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the administrator console in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the locale parameter to (1) CFIDE/administrator/settings/mappings.cfm, (2) logging/settings.cfm, (3) datasources/index.cfm, (4) j2eepackaging/editarchive.cfm, and (5) enter.cfm in CFIDE/administrator/.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2010-2861", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-22", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2010-08-11T18:47:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in the administrator console in Adobe ColdFusion 9.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the locale parameter to (1) CFIDE/administrator/settings/mappings.cfm, (2) logging/settings.cfm, (3) datasources/index.cfm, (4) j2eepackaging/editarchive.cfm, and (5) enter.cfm in CFIDE/administrator/.", id: "GHSA-x38c-xq6c-937h", modified: "2024-07-16T18:31:31Z", published: "2022-05-17T05:04:21Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2861", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8137", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8148", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-18.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/coldfusion-directory-traversal-faq-cve-2010-2861", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.procheckup.com/vulnerability_manager/vulnerabilities/pr10-07", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.