ghsa-wpgm-g43f-rx6f
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-21 18:31
Modified
2024-11-06 18:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tty: n_gsm: fix race condition in status line change on dead connections

gsm_cleanup_mux() cleans up the gsm by closing all DLCIs, stopping all timers, removing the virtual tty devices and clearing the data queues. This procedure, however, may cause subsequent changes of the virtual modem status lines of a DLCI. More data is being added the outgoing data queue and the deleted kick timer is restarted to handle this. At this point many resources have already been removed by the cleanup procedure. Thus, a kernel panic occurs.

Fix this by proving in gsm_modem_update() that the cleanup procedure has not been started and the mux is still alive.

Note that writing to a virtual tty is already protected by checks against the DLCI specific connection state.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2023-52872",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-362",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2024-05-21T16:15:23Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntty: n_gsm: fix race condition in status line change on dead connections\n\ngsm_cleanup_mux() cleans up the gsm by closing all DLCIs, stopping all\ntimers, removing the virtual tty devices and clearing the data queues.\nThis procedure, however, may cause subsequent changes of the virtual modem\nstatus lines of a DLCI. More data is being added the outgoing data queue\nand the deleted kick timer is restarted to handle this. At this point many\nresources have already been removed by the cleanup procedure. Thus, a\nkernel panic occurs.\n\nFix this by proving in gsm_modem_update() that the cleanup procedure has\nnot been started and the mux is still alive.\n\nNote that writing to a virtual tty is already protected by checks against\nthe DLCI specific connection state.",
   id: "GHSA-wpgm-g43f-rx6f",
   modified: "2024-11-06T18:31:04Z",
   published: "2024-05-21T18:31:23Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-52872",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/19d34b73234af542cc8a218cf398dee73cdb1890",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a75b205de43365f80a33b98ec9289785da56243",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81a4dd5e6c78f5d8952fa8c9d36565db1fe01444",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce4df90333c4fe65acb8b5089fdfe9b955ce976a",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df6cfab66ff2a44bd23ad5dd5309cb3421bb6593",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.