ghsa-wjxh-hxxv-h4vm
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:14
Modified
2022-08-22 00:00
Severity ?
Details
vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-3778", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-122", "CWE-787", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-09-15T08:15:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "vim is vulnerable to Heap-based Buffer Overflow", id: "GHSA-wjxh-hxxv-h4vm", modified: "2022-08-22T00:00:55Z", published: "2022-05-24T19:14:48Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3778", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/65b605665997fad54ef39a93199e305af2fe4d7f", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://huntr.dev/bounties/d9c17308-2c99-4f9f-a706-f7f72c24c273", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/01/msg00003.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7K4JJBIH3OQSZRVTWKCJCDLGMFGQ5DOH", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S42L4Z4DTW4LHLQ4FJ33VEOXRCBE7WN4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TE62UMYBZE4AE53K6OBBWK32XQ7544QM", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202208-32", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221118-0003", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/10/01/1", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.