github - ghsa-wjm4-hw2r-m766

ghsa-wjm4-hw2r-m766

Vulnerability from github

Published

2025-04-17 03:30

Modified

2025-04-17 03:30

Severity ?

3.3 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Details

VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference='../../../set/set[2]' is used, aka an "insecure deserialization" issue.

Show details on source website

To clipboard

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-43708"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-674"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-17T01:15:46Z",
    "severity": "LOW"
  },
  "details": "VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference=\u0027../../../set/set[2]\u0027 is used, aka an \"insecure deserialization\" issue.",
  "id": "GHSA-wjm4-hw2r-m766",
  "modified": "2025-04-17T03:30:30Z",
  "published": "2025-04-17T03:30:30Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-43708"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Gelcon/PoC-of-VisiCut2_1-Stack-Overflow-Vul"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/t-oster/VisiCut"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://visicut.org"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}

CVE-2025-43708 (GCVE-0-2025-43708)

Vulnerability from cvelistv5

Published

2025-04-17 00:00

Modified

2025-04-17 19:22

Severity ?

3.3 (Low) - CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

CWE

CWE-674 - Uncontrolled Recursion

Summary

VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference='../../../set/set[2]' is used, aka an "insecure deserialization" issue.

References

URL

Tags

	https://github.com/Gelcon/PoC-of-VisiCut2_1-Stack-Overflow-Vul
	https://github.com/t-oster/VisiCut
	https://visicut.org

Impacted products

	Vendor	Product	Version
	VisiCut	VisiCut	Version: 0 <

Show details on NVD website

To clipboard

{
  "containers": {
    "adp": [
      {
        "metrics": [
          {
            "other": {
              "content": {
                "id": "CVE-2025-43708",
                "options": [
                  {
                    "Exploitation": "poc"
                  },
                  {
                    "Automatable": "no"
                  },
                  {
                    "Technical Impact": "partial"
                  }
                ],
                "role": "CISA Coordinator",
                "timestamp": "2025-04-17T19:22:34.982107Z",
                "version": "2.0.3"
              },
              "type": "ssvc"
            }
          }
        ],
        "providerMetadata": {
          "dateUpdated": "2025-04-17T19:22:56.942Z",
          "orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
          "shortName": "CISA-ADP"
        },
        "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
      }
    ],
    "cna": {
      "affected": [
        {
          "defaultStatus": "unknown",
          "product": "VisiCut",
          "vendor": "VisiCut",
          "versions": [
            {
              "lessThanOrEqual": "2.1",
              "status": "affected",
              "version": "0",
              "versionType": "custom"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "descriptions": [
        {
          "lang": "en",
          "value": "VisiCut 2.1 allows stack consumption via an XML document with nested set elements, as demonstrated by a java.util.HashMap StackOverflowError when reference=\u0027../../../set/set[2]\u0027 is used, aka an \"insecure deserialization\" issue."
        }
      ],
      "metrics": [
        {
          "cvssV3_1": {
            "baseScore": 3.3,
            "baseSeverity": "LOW",
            "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L",
            "version": "3.1"
          }
        }
      ],
      "problemTypes": [
        {
          "descriptions": [
            {
              "cweId": "CWE-674",
              "description": "CWE-674 Uncontrolled Recursion",
              "lang": "en",
              "type": "CWE"
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "providerMetadata": {
        "dateUpdated": "2025-04-17T00:25:39.027Z",
        "orgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
        "shortName": "mitre"
      },
      "references": [
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/Gelcon/PoC-of-VisiCut2_1-Stack-Overflow-Vul"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://github.com/t-oster/VisiCut"
        },
        {
          "url": "https://visicut.org"
        }
      ],
      "x_generator": {
        "engine": "enrichogram 0.0.1"
      }
    }
  },
  "cveMetadata": {
    "assignerOrgId": "8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca",
    "assignerShortName": "mitre",
    "cveId": "CVE-2025-43708",
    "datePublished": "2025-04-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateReserved": "2025-04-17T00:00:00.000Z",
    "dateUpdated": "2025-04-17T19:22:56.942Z",
    "state": "PUBLISHED"
  },
  "dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
  "dataVersion": "5.1"
}

Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Tags

Taxonomy of the tags.

All sightings related to this event Export sightings related to this event

Sightings

Author	Source	Type	Date

Nomenclature

Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.