GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-WGC9-J6GH-934M

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dlm: fix add msg handle in send_queue ordered

In a benchmark scenario triggering a lot of requests that triggers a lot of DLM messages on the network it can be that the mh->seq is not ordered according the oldest seq number. This ordering is required by dlm_receive_ack as "before(mh->seq, seq)" will stop to check for older sequence numbers that are ordered in the tail of "node->send_queue".

The side effects of not having it correct ordered regarding "before(mh->seq, seq)" are refcounting issues and use-after free.

I only was able to reproduce this issue in a experimental DLM branch and a user space DLM benchmark that uses io_uring. After changing this I don't experienced any refcounting with the sending buffer issues anymore.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-74401"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:42Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndlm: fix add msg handle in send_queue ordered\n\nIn a benchmark scenario triggering a lot of requests that triggers a lot\nof DLM messages on the network it can be that the mh-\u003eseq is not ordered\naccording the oldest seq number. This ordering is required by\ndlm_receive_ack as \"before(mh-\u003eseq, seq)\" will stop to check for older\nsequence numbers that are ordered in the tail of \"node-\u003esend_queue\".\n\nThe side effects of not having it correct ordered regarding\n\"before(mh-\u003eseq, seq)\" are refcounting issues and use-after free.\n\nI only was able to reproduce this issue in a experimental DLM branch\nand a user space DLM benchmark that uses io_uring. After changing this I\ndon\u0027t experienced any refcounting with the sending buffer issues anymore.",
  "id": "GHSA-wgc9-j6gh-934m",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:43Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:32Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74401"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4d45250b1d22960f86d83245be188b16e456218b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6369619f1b665f12d8c99cc6ff733c64eb08b22e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/712714f818d83373847874ab0f8e426be79296cf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ae9e534e502a0f48c12baf83608c5de0ff0eab11"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2248cb70c070f8f04762872772e155b59016f17"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…