ghsa-vwp4-85g8-fgjg
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-25 09:32
Modified
2024-10-25 09:32
Severity ?
9.1 (Critical) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Details

Sharp and Toshiba Tec MFPs improperly process HTTP authentication requests, resulting in an authentication bypass vulnerability.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2024-47406",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-288",
         "CWE-306",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2024-10-25T07:15:04Z",
      severity: "CRITICAL",
   },
   details: "Sharp and Toshiba Tec MFPs improperly process HTTP authentication requests, resulting in an authentication bypass vulnerability.",
   id: "GHSA-vwp4-85g8-fgjg",
   modified: "2024-10-25T09:32:00Z",
   published: "2024-10-25T09:32:00Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47406",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://global.sharp/products/copier/info/info_security_2024-10.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://jvn.jp/en/vu/JVNVU95063136",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://www.toshibatec.com/information/20241025_01.html",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.