ghsa-vw3v-9427-r3gf
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-10-21 18:30
Modified
2024-10-25 15:31
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amd/display: Check null pointers before used

[WHAT & HOW] Poniters, such as dc->clk_mgr, are null checked previously in the same function, so Coverity warns "implies that "dc->clk_mgr" might be null". As a result, these pointers need to be checked when used again.

This fixes 10 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-49921"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-10-21T18:15:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Check null pointers before used\n\n[WHAT \u0026 HOW]\nPoniters, such as dc-\u003eclk_mgr, are null checked previously in the same\nfunction, so Coverity warns \"implies that \"dc-\u003eclk_mgr\" might be null\".\nAs a result, these pointers need to be checked when used again.\n\nThis fixes 10 FORWARD_NULL issues reported by Coverity.",
  "id": "GHSA-vw3v-9427-r3gf",
  "modified": "2024-10-25T15:31:25Z",
  "published": "2024-10-21T18:30:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-49921"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5b35bf1a82eb29841b67ff5643ba83762250fc24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be1fb44389ca3038ad2430dac4234669bc177ee3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.