ghsa-vvrq-5r5v-gm84
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:37
Modified
2022-05-17 05:37
Details
Memory leak in Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x through 3.2.x, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.x before 8.5(1)su2, and 8.6 before 8.6(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and device reload or process failure) via a malformed SIP message, aka Bug IDs CSCtl86047 and CSCto88686.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-2072" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-10-03T23:55:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Memory leak in Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1, Cisco IOS XE 2.5.x through 3.2.x, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su4, 8.x before 8.5(1)su2, and 8.6 before 8.6(1) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and device reload or process failure) via a malformed SIP message, aka Bug IDs CSCtl86047 and CSCto88686.", "id": "GHSA-vvrq-5r5v-gm84", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:37:14Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:37:14Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2072" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20110928-cucm" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=24129" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b95d58.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b95d5a.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026110" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.