ghsa-vvg4-mx6x-53j6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:09
Modified
2022-05-13 01:09
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in gui/image/qbmphandler.cpp in the QtBase module in Qt before 4.8.7 and 5.x before 5.4.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-1858" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-05-12T19:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in gui/image/qbmphandler.cpp in the QtBase module in Qt before 4.8.7 and 5.x before 5.4.2 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault and crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted BMP image.", "id": "GHSA-vvg4-mx6x-53j6", "modified": "2022-05-13T01:09:17Z", "published": "2022-05-13T01:09:17Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-1858" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/108312" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201603-10" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155424.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155927.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155962.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/155976.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-April/156727.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/announce/2015-April/000067.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74309" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2626-1" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.