ghsa-vrpq-h3wp-3cp5
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 02:20
Modified
2022-05-01 02:20
Details
Buffer overflow in the SVG importer (style.cpp) of inkscape 0.41 through 0.42.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SVG file with long CSS style property values.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-3737" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-11-22T00:03:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in the SVG importer (style.cpp) of inkscape 0.41 through 0.42.2 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a SVG file with long CSS style property values.", "id": "GHSA-vrpq-h3wp-3cp5", "modified": "2022-05-01T02:20:37Z", "published": "2022-05-01T02:20:37Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-3737" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=330894" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/inkscape/inkscape/src/style.cpp?r1=1.110\u0026r2=1.110.2.1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17651" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17662" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17778" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/17882" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/58" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-916" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200511-22.xml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_28_sr.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/15507" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.ubuntulinux.org/usn/usn-217-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2005/2511" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.