GHSA-VR3C-8577-3F9J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:12 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:12
VLAI
Details
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Php Scriptlerim Who's Who script allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or requests that (1) add an admin account via a request to filepath/yonetim/plugin/adminsave.php or have unspecified impact via a request to (2) ayarsave.php, (3) uyesave.php, (4) slaytadd.php, or (5) slaytsave.php.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-8953"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-352"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-11-17T16:59:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Php Scriptlerim Who\u0027s Who script allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators or requests that (1) add an admin account via a request to filepath/yonetim/plugin/adminsave.php or have unspecified impact via a request to (2) ayarsave.php, (3) uyesave.php, (4) slaytadd.php, or (5) slaytsave.php.",
"id": "GHSA-vr3c-8577-3f9j",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:12:36Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:12:36Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-8953"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/98631"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/129102/Whos-Who-Script-Cross-Site-Request-Forgery.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/35129"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…