ghsa-vj9c-27hg-w432
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-05-17 15:31
Modified
2025-02-03 18:30
Severity ?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
clk: mediatek: mt7622-apmixedsys: Fix an error handling path in clk_mt8135_apmixed_probe()
'clk_data' is allocated with mtk_devm_alloc_clk_data(). So calling mtk_free_clk_data() explicitly in the remove function would lead to a double-free.
Remove the redundant call.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2024-27433", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-415", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2024-05-17T13:15:57Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nclk: mediatek: mt7622-apmixedsys: Fix an error handling path in clk_mt8135_apmixed_probe()\n\n'clk_data' is allocated with mtk_devm_alloc_clk_data(). So calling\nmtk_free_clk_data() explicitly in the remove function would lead to a\ndouble-free.\n\nRemove the redundant call.", id: "GHSA-vj9c-27hg-w432", modified: "2025-02-03T18:30:36Z", published: "2024-05-17T15:31:07Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-27433", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a32e88f2b20259f5fe4f8eed598bbc85dc4879ed", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/de3340533bd68a7b3d6be1841b8eb3fa6c762fe6", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3633fed984f1db106ff737a0bb52fadb2d89ac7", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa761ce7a1d15cca1a306b3635f81a22b15fee5b", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.