ghsa-vhfq-hmc6-hfjh
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 03:44
Modified
2022-05-17 03:44
Severity ?
Details
The calloc function in the glibc package in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6.7 and 7.2 does not properly initialize memory areas, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (hang or crash) via unspecified vectors.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2015-5229", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2016-04-08T15:59:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "The calloc function in the glibc package in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) 6.7 and 7.2 does not properly initialize memory areas, which might allow context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (hang or crash) via unspecified vectors.", id: "GHSA-vhfq-hmc6-hfjh", modified: "2022-05-17T03:44:51Z", published: "2022-05-17T03:44:51Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-5229", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246713", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256285", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293976", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10150", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0176.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjan2016-2867209.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/84172", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.