GHSA-VFVV-C25P-M7MM

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-15 18:09 – Updated: 2026-05-15 18:09
VLAI
Summary
rkyv: Panic safety bugs in `InlineVec::clear` and `SerVec::clear` enable arbitrary code execution
Details

InlineVec::clear() and SerVec::clear() in rkyv were not panic-safe. Both functions iterate over their elements and call drop_in_place on each, updating self.len only after the loop. If an element's Drop implementation panics during the loop, self.len is left at its original value.

A subsequent invocation of clear() on the same container then re-visits the already-freed elements:

  • InlineVec::clear() is called again from InlineVec's own Drop implementation when the value is later dropped.
  • SerVec::clear() is called again by SerVec::with_capacity() after the user closure returns.

Technical Impact

  • CWE-415 (Double Free): Heap corruption when element type holds Box<T>
  • CWE-416 (Use-After-Free): Memory corruption when element reads from heap during Drop

Both vulnerabilities are triggerable entirely from safe Rust via std::panic::catch_unwind and require no special privileges.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "rkyv"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0.8.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.8.16"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-415",
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-15T18:09:10Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "`InlineVec::clear()` and `SerVec::clear()` in `rkyv` were not panic-safe. Both functions iterate over their elements and call `drop_in_place` on each, updating `self.len` only *after* the loop. If an element\u0027s `Drop` implementation panics during the loop, `self.len` is left at its original value.\n\nA subsequent invocation of `clear()` on the same container then re-visits the already-freed elements:\n\n- `InlineVec::clear()` is called again from `InlineVec`\u0027s own `Drop` implementation when the value is later dropped.\n- `SerVec::clear()` is called again by `SerVec::with_capacity()` after the  user closure returns.\n\n\n## Technical Impact\n\n- **CWE-415 (Double Free):** Heap corruption when element type holds `Box\u003cT\u003e`  \n- **CWE-416 (Use-After-Free):** Memory corruption when element reads from heap during `Drop`\n\nBoth vulnerabilities are triggerable entirely from safe Rust via `std::panic::catch_unwind` and require no special privileges.",
  "id": "GHSA-vfvv-c25p-m7mm",
  "modified": "2026-05-15T18:09:10Z",
  "published": "2026-05-15T18:09:10Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/rkyv/rkyv/commit/5828cf5c27b664eb4432c4a93d4769e12e5e42fb"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/rkyv/rkyv"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0122.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "rkyv: Panic safety bugs in `InlineVec::clear` and `SerVec::clear` enable arbitrary code execution"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…